INTRODUCTIONAny rupture of the waterproofing element of a roofing assembly generally leads to failure of the total assembly, from both a weatherproofing and a heat transfer viewpoint. Moseley [1]-^has indicated that tension splits which occur in the built-up membrane are frequent causes of failure. Cullen [2] suggested that the thermal movement which occurs in a bituminous built-up roofing membrane due to rapid temperature changes is often a contributing factor in tension splits.He proposed the utilization of a Thermal-Shock Resistance Factor [3] to predict the ability of a built-up membrane to tolerate, without rupture, the forces induced by such temperature changes [4] The higher the breaking load, the lower the apparent linear thermal expansion coefficient and the lower the modulus of elongation the more resistant the membrane will be to rupture under thermal changes. These parameters were combined in a Thermal-Shock Resistance Factor given by the following equation ( The development of the Thermal-Shock Resistance Factor has been reported, and values for three conventional built-up membranes were given at temperatures of -30°F (-34 .4°C ) , 0°F (-17.8°C), 30°F (-1.1°C), and 73°F (22.8°C) [6].
/Figures in brackets refer to references presented at the end of this paper.
LIThe breaking loads and moduli of elongation are expressed in pounds per inch width of membrane since a previous study [5] had shown that the effect of the bonding bitumen on the strength characteristics of the membrane are negligible. The elongation moduli are the slopes of the initial tangent to the load-strain curves. Four types of bituminous saturated or impregnated felts and two types of bitumen were selected for the preparation of laboratory specimens. Table 1 identifies the materials.The laboratory prepared specimens consisted of two, three and four plies of felt adhered to each other with the appropriate bitumen applied at a spreading rate of about 25-30 lb per 100 sq. ft., which is comparable to that obtained in good roofing practice. The laboratory prepared specimens were cut into a dumbbell-shaped according to a procedure developed at the National Bureau of Standards [6] . Figure 2 shows the die, the test specimen, and a cross section of the test specimen.
FieldIn order to obtain samples from roofs of known history, it was necessary to rely upon the roofing industry. Samples were obtained through the cooperation of contractor associations, roofing manufacturers, and, in many cases, private roofing contractors.Two samples, a minimum of one square foot in area, were cut from the selected roof.The samples were identified in respect to location, composition and felt orientation, and were forwarded to NBS. A history, as well as a diagram of the roof plan, frequently accompanied the samples.In some cases the roofs in question were observed by a NBS representative who selected the areas from which the samples were to be removed.In the cases of roof rupture, samples were taken near the failure.Information of the field samples relative to...