Effects of Three Antecedents of Patient Compliance for Users of Peer-to-Peer Online Health Communities: Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract

BackgroundOver the past 50 years, patient noncompliance has appeared as a major public health concern and focus of a great deal of research because it endangers patient recovery and imposes a considerable financial burden on health care systems. Meanwhile, online health communities (OHCs) are becoming more common and are commonly used by individuals with health problems, and they may have a role in facilitating compliance. Despite this growing popularity, little is known about patient compliance predictors for OHCs’ users.ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the extent to which participating in OHCs may trigger higher levels of compliance. It identified 3 interrelated predictors that may affect patient compliance: patient empowerment gained through peer-to-peer OHCs, satisfaction with the physician, and commitment to the physician.MethodsA Web-based survey tested the conceptual model and assessed the effects of patient empowerment gained through OHCs on patient satisfaction and commitment to the physician, as well as the effects of these 3 predictors on patient compliance with the proposed treatment. Members of peer-to-peer OHCs were asked to answer an online questionnaire. A convenience sample of 420 patients experiencing chronic illness and using peer-to-peer OHCs was surveyed in August 2018 in Québec, Canada. A path analysis using structural equation modeling tested the proposed relationships between the predictors and their respective paths on patient compliance. The mediation effects of these predictor variables on patient compliance were estimated with the PROCESS macro in SPSS.ResultsThe findings indicated that patient empowerment gained through OHCs was positively related to patient commitment to the physician (beta=.69; P<.001) and patient compliance with the proposed treatment (beta=.35; P<.001). Patient commitment also positively influenced patient compliance (beta=.74; P<.001). Patient empowerment did not exert a significant influence on patient satisfaction with the physician (beta=.02; P=.76), and satisfaction did not affect compliance (beta=−.07; P=.05); however, patient satisfaction was positively related to patient commitment to the physician (beta=.14; P<.01). The impact of empowerment on compliance was partially mediated by commitment to the physician (beta=.32; 95% CI 0.22-0.44) but not by satisfaction.ConclusionsThis study highlights the importance of peer-to-peer OHCs for two main reasons. The primary reason is that patient empowerment gained through peer-to-peer OHCs both directly and indirectly enhances patient compliance with the proposed treatment. The underlying mechanisms of these effects were shown. Second, commitment to the physician was found to play a more critical role than satisfaction with the physician in determining patient-physician relationship quality. Overall, our findings support the assumption that health care stakeholders should encourage the use of peer-to-peer OHCs to favor patient empowerment and patient commitment to the physician to increase patient compliance w...

Superusers’ Engagement in Asthma Online Communities: Asynchronous Web-Based Interview Study

“…Engagement with OHCs promoted superusers’ sense of personal control/agency/self-efficacy over their illness, particularly when adopting the informal role of wise mentors or supporters to other users. Interestingly, a recent study indicated that patients gained empowerment through OHCs, which was positively related to patient commitment to the physician and to patient compliance with the proposed treatment [ 2 ]. Moreover, there is evidence that users who are high engagers (such as superusers who are themselves patients) exhibit the greatest improvement in patient activation measure (PAM; a measure that captures the extent to which people feel engaged and confident in taking care of their condition) in HealthUnlocked OHCs, even if the average change in PAM across all levels of engagement is not clinically meaningful [ 39 ].…”

“…Recent work has suggested that taking part in online communities for people with long-term conditions (LTCs) improves illness self-management [ 1 ] and adherence to treatment [ 2 ], produces positive health-related outcomes [ 3 - 5 ], facilitates shared decision making with health care professionals (HCPs) [ 6 - 8 ], and may even reduce mortality [ 9 ]. There is also evidence that self-management support interventions can reduce health service utilization [ 10 , 11 ].…”

“…As users become more active within the community, they become more likely to reply to posts than to ask questions. This suggests that superusers gradually become experts , providing others with advice and support [ 2 , 7 , 26 ].…”

Social Media Big Data: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly (Un)truths

“…This also begets consideration of developing alternatives and complements to social media as sources of reliable health information hosting and exchange, with several recently launched in response to COVID-19 misinformation. Online health communities (OHCs) have drawn increasing interest in the domain of virtual social networks due to their potential to amplify positive impact such as peer-support and quality data as a source of health evidence (Smith et al, 2017;Audrain-Pontevia et al, 2019), as well as mitigate against negative impact through policies against the promotion of inaccurate information, as well as configurations that involve medical practitioners in moderation and content generation (Eysenbach, 2000;AskDr, 2020).…”

La santé numérique : un levier pour améliorer l’accessibilité aux soins de santé au Québec

“…les personnes ayant survécu au cancer (Jansen et collab., 2015) et les personnes asthmatiques (Farzandipour et collab., 2017); Amélioration de l'autogestion : Les applications mobiles en santé permettent d'améliorer la gestion du diabète pour les personnes diabétiques (Bonoto et collab., 2017); Acquisition de connaissances : Les interventions en ligne permettent aux patients d'acquérir des connaissances sur leurs conditions de santé (Solomon, Wagner et Goes, 2012); Amélioration de la communication : L'utilisation d'une application mobile en santé permet d'améliorer la communication avec les professionnels de la santé (Lu et collab., 2018); Amélioration potentielle au traitement prescrit par le médecin : La santé mobile semble apporter des bénéfices pour améliorer l'adhérence à la médication (Hamine et collab., 2015). La participation du patient dans les communautés en ligne de patients accroît son adhésion au traitement prescrit par le médecin (Audrain-Pontevia, Menvielle et Ertz, 2019). (Gartner, 2018); Meilleur usage des soins en maisons de retraite : L'utilisation de la télémédecine permet d'améliorer les soins en maisons de retraite (Breen et Zhang, 2008).…”