2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Three Months of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (dalteparin) Treatment After Bypass Surgery for Lower Limb Ischemia—A Randomised Placebo-controlled Double Blind Multicentre Trial

Abstract: In patients on ASA treatment, long-term postoperative dalteparin treatment did not improve patency after peripheral artery bypass grafting. Therefore, low molecular weight heparin treatment cannot be recommended for routine use after bypass surgery for critical lower limb ischemia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another trial randomized 284 patients with critical limb ischemia to 5,000 IU LMWH or placebo daily for 3 months. 130 All patients also received aspirin (75 mg/d). Three-month patency rates were 83% and 80% for LMWH vs control, and 59% for both treatments at 1 year.…”
Section: Postoperative Heparin Dextrans All Types Of Lower-extremitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another trial randomized 284 patients with critical limb ischemia to 5,000 IU LMWH or placebo daily for 3 months. 130 All patients also received aspirin (75 mg/d). Three-month patency rates were 83% and 80% for LMWH vs control, and 59% for both treatments at 1 year.…”
Section: Postoperative Heparin Dextrans All Types Of Lower-extremitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spinal cord stimulation treatment was associated with reduced care costs compared with usual care, and ER reduced mortality more than bypass surgery did . Both outcomes were reported to need higher quality evidence …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The benefit was not observed in patients with the bypass with 8 mm diameter [101]. Also, the use of dalteparin combined with ASA failed to benefit the patients who had undergone surgical revascularization due to LEAD [102]. The benefits from using warfarin and ASA compared to ASA alone were observed in a small study on patients with venous bypasses who were in the high bypass occlusion risk group (suboptimal bypass, poor reception of blood from the bypass, reoperation).…”
Section: Patients With Lower Extremity Artery Disease Who Underwent Imentioning
confidence: 98%