2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10043-009-0054-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of tilt of the visual stimuli on the perception of gravitational vertical under normal- and hyper-gravity conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, when considered in terms of frequency, it has been shown that lower frequencies (below 1 Hz) result in greater COP migration [20]. In a study on the perception of gravity by visual stimuli, it was reported that the vection effect does not increase any further when the tilt angle exceeds 20 degrees, but rather diminishes [21]. These factors may have caused the VR1 condition (with a tilt angle of up to 10 degrees at 1 • /s) to have the strongest vection effect, resulting in a greater degree of COP movement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, when considered in terms of frequency, it has been shown that lower frequencies (below 1 Hz) result in greater COP migration [20]. In a study on the perception of gravity by visual stimuli, it was reported that the vection effect does not increase any further when the tilt angle exceeds 20 degrees, but rather diminishes [21]. These factors may have caused the VR1 condition (with a tilt angle of up to 10 degrees at 1 • /s) to have the strongest vection effect, resulting in a greater degree of COP movement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have investigated SVV, including the threshold of body tilt and its age-related change, 12,13 body balance in healthy individuals, 14 relationship to vestibular migraine and vestibulopathy patients, 15,16 and so on. The SVV has been used to characterize gravity perception under various gravity conditions, such as microgravity, 17 hypergravity, 18,19 and whole-body tilt. 20 However, these methods are not suitable for clinical examinations due to the bulky equipment, high costs, and complex protocols involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%