1985
DOI: 10.1016/0093-691x(85)90161-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of time of PMSG and fixed-time GnRH injections on estrus incidence and fertility in physiologically different ewes pre-treated with progestogen-impregnated vaginal sponge during the nonbreeding season

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, deNicolo et al (2008) reported higher pregnancy rate in the breeding season as compared to non-breeding season following estrus synchronization and natural mating. Although the lambing percentage is less in non-breeding season, it is comparable with previous studies (Fukui et al 1985;Wheaton et al 1992;Ungerfeld & Rubianes 2002). In the present study, the breeding season had not influenced the ovulation rate, since the estrus percentage were not significantly different between the breeding and non-breeding season.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Similarly, deNicolo et al (2008) reported higher pregnancy rate in the breeding season as compared to non-breeding season following estrus synchronization and natural mating. Although the lambing percentage is less in non-breeding season, it is comparable with previous studies (Fukui et al 1985;Wheaton et al 1992;Ungerfeld & Rubianes 2002). In the present study, the breeding season had not influenced the ovulation rate, since the estrus percentage were not significantly different between the breeding and non-breeding season.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Although the fertility of inseminated ewes on the 3 farms were not directly c o m p a r a b l e d u e t o t h e d i f f e r e n c e i n t h e insemination doses between Farm T (0.2 or 0.4 ml) and the other two (S and M) farms (0.1-0.2 ml), the lambing rates on the 3 farms (48 to 64%) were not significantly different. The fertility of inseminated or naturally mated ewes may be influenced by the body condition and physiological status of each ewe, and the different management feeding systems at each farm [8,9]. The mean body condition score in ewes at Farm S (3.5 units) was higher than that at Farm M (2.4 units) probably due to the short period from the previous lambing, but the score difference was not significantly different and did not affect the lambing rates of the ewes between Farms S and M.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first reports of the use of GnRH in artificially inseminated ewes did not demonstrate an increase in the number of pregnant ewes over control ewes (Fukui et al 1985;, but nevertheless did considerably improve the synchrony of ovulation (Smith et al 1986). Further refinement of the technique may produce positive results and, despite the added cost and effort, it may eventually prove to be worthwhile to use GnRH analogues in conjunction with intrauterine insemination of frozen-thawed semen.…”
Section: Time Oj Inseminationmentioning
confidence: 99%