2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-015-2442-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of topography and forest stand dynamics on soil morphology in three natural Picea abies mountain forests

Abstract: Background and aims Soil evolution in mountain areas is strongly influenced by vegetation and terrain topography. In managed forests, however, relationships of the soil to the environment are modified or masked by human intervention. The objective of our study was to uncover the mutual effects of topographic and forest stand factors on the evolution and variability of soils in natural mountain spruce forests. Methods Ordination analyses were applied to extensive data on soil morphology, terrain topography and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
7
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies at this scale show divergent pedogenesis associated with dynamical instabilities in topographic/soil coevolution, vertical translocation processes, and persistence of pedological impacts of disturbances (Ibanez et al 1994;Schaetzl et al 2006;Toomanian et al 2006;Samonil et al 2014Samonil et al , 2015Valtera et al 2015). Some pedon-scale studies also show dynamically unstable trends toward increasing variability (Phillips 2000(Phillips , 2001bMontagne et al 2013) that imply non-convergent development at broader scales.…”
Section: Pedologymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Other studies at this scale show divergent pedogenesis associated with dynamical instabilities in topographic/soil coevolution, vertical translocation processes, and persistence of pedological impacts of disturbances (Ibanez et al 1994;Schaetzl et al 2006;Toomanian et al 2006;Samonil et al 2014Samonil et al , 2015Valtera et al 2015). Some pedon-scale studies also show dynamically unstable trends toward increasing variability (Phillips 2000(Phillips , 2001bMontagne et al 2013) that imply non-convergent development at broader scales.…”
Section: Pedologymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…While soils in the treeline ecotone and in the adjacent lower alpine zone (i.e., potential treeline) have developed with the limits set by the general elevational gradients of temperature and precipitation, they vary considerably depending on the local parent material, substrate (physical and chemical properties), vegetation, and on climate history (e.g., [51,[59][60][61][62]). Thus, a locally varying mosaic of soils (soil types) is typical of the treeline ecotone, whereas no real treeline-specific soils exist [5].…”
Section: Treeline At Landscape (Regional) Local and Microscalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, a suitable environment for organisms is mainly defined by soil physical and chemical properties [55]. However, in general, soils may act at different spatial and temporal scales and change vegetation [56], their attributes together with other habitat and microhabitat characteristics play an important role in biology communities [3]. Moreover, MR and WT fluctuations influence soil physical and chemical characteristic that can play an important role in vegetation dynamics, especially in coastal areas with silty loam saline soils.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%