1986
DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(86)80008-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of total knee replacement design on femoral—Tibial contact conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Visual analysis of the lateral radiographs of the flexion series in the prosthetic knees suggested that the contact point between the femoral condyles and the tibial plateau did not move backwards during flexion, as was observed in the normal knees, but was located centrally or even slightly anteriorly (Soudry et al 1986), suggesting that no "roll-back" occurred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Visual analysis of the lateral radiographs of the flexion series in the prosthetic knees suggested that the contact point between the femoral condyles and the tibial plateau did not move backwards during flexion, as was observed in the normal knees, but was located centrally or even slightly anteriorly (Soudry et al 1986), suggesting that no "roll-back" occurred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Soudry M, Walker PS, Reilly DT, Kurosawa H. [16] showed that cruciate resection increases the shear forces and the rokking moments to the tibial components and that additional fixation means may be necessary to compensate. On the other hand, cruciate retention with low conformity gives higher contact forces, which may lead to more wear in the long term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9,17,18 If the PCL is resected substitution with a posterior-stabilised (PS) design may be carried out but translation and gait may not be restored. 5,8,9 We compared the kinetics of a concave with those of a PS insert one year after operation using radiostereometry to determine whether the use of a PS design with a central post results in less translation and rotation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%