2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2004.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of trait dominance on psychological and cardiovascular responses to social influence attempts: the role of gender and partner dominance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Having identified the different initial responses to varying stress stimuli, future studies should examine if there are specific hemodynamic response patterns (cardiac versus vascular), possibly reflecting differences in sympathoadrenal activation (Gramer and Berner, 2005;McCaffery et al, 2000), and whether these responses differ between mental challenge, orthostatic challenge, and combinations of both.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having identified the different initial responses to varying stress stimuli, future studies should examine if there are specific hemodynamic response patterns (cardiac versus vascular), possibly reflecting differences in sympathoadrenal activation (Gramer and Berner, 2005;McCaffery et al, 2000), and whether these responses differ between mental challenge, orthostatic challenge, and combinations of both.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, exposure during a problem-solving interaction to a male partner who displays dominant behavior produces greater SBP reactivity in women (Newton and Bane 2001). Both men and women also display elevated DBP while interacting with a dominant partner when instructed to influence their partner or when asserting differing opinions (Gramer and Berner 2005;Newton et al 1999). Similarly, when interacting with a spouse, wives given the task to influence their husbands exhibit greater DBP reactivity when they perceive him to be dominant (Brown et al 1998) However, subordinate individuals do not always exhibit greater reactivity.…”
Section: Physiological Effects Of Social Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-dominant compared to low-dominant participants report experiencing less distress and having higher confidence when asserting an opposing opinion during a discussion task (Gramer and Berner 2005). Several researchers have found that men's satisfaction with their relationships is not affected by the hostility characteristics of their partner interactions, whereas women are highly attuned to and influenced by a male partner's hostility (Ewart et al 1991;Gaelick et al 1985;KiecoltGlaser et al 1993;Loving et al 2004).…”
Section: Are Wives Typically the Subordinate Marital Partner?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, there is some evidence for more complete blood pressure recovery in dominant individuals (Gramer, 2003) or individuals assigned to an induced dominant status condition (Mendelson, Thurston, & Kubzansky, 2008). Furthermore, cardiac responses of high dominant individuals were accompanied by higher appraised coping efficacy and less experienced distress (Gramer, 2003;Gramer & Berner, 2005;Hughes & Callinan, 2007;Mendelson et al, 2008). Overall, these findings seem to suggest more adaptive stress-related responses in high compared to low dominant individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Investigations that directly assessed the influence of trait dominance on cardiovascular reactivity (CVR) are few in number. However, several of these studies observed enhanced SBP reactivity (Gramer, 2003;Gramer & Berner, 2005;Hughes & Callinan, 2007;Newton, Bane, Flores, & Greenfield, 1999;Newton, Watters, Philhower, & Weigel, 2005) in high trait dominant individuals, whereas responses of low dominants might be characterized by greater diastolic (DBP) or (alphaadrenergically mediated) vascular reactivity (Gramer, 2003;Gramer & Berner, 2005). Similarly, mental activation of a state of high social power was found to elicit a cardiac response, whereas mental activation of low social power was accompanied by greater vascular activity (Scheepers, de Wit, Ellemers, & Sassenberg, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%