2021
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.628229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Neurofeedback on Alpha (EEG) Dynamics: A Review

Abstract: Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and neurofeedback (NFB) are two different types of non-invasive neuromodulation techniques, which can modulate brain activity and improve brain functioning. In this review, we compared the current state of knowledge related to the mechanisms of tACS and NFB and their effects on electroencephalogram (EEG) activity (online period/stimulation period) and on aftereffects (offline period/post/stimulation period), including the duration of their persistence and pot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 209 publications
(565 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spatial separation of different posterior alpha rhythms through ICA in single subjects could resolve some of the previous inconsistencies in the literature concerning the role of alpha phase, power and frequency in cognition (Michail et al, 2021; Pavlov & Kotchoubey, 2020; Samaha et al, 2020; Zazio et al, 2021). Similarly, separating different posterior alpha rhythms could allow us to understand why some neurofeedback and neurostimulation protocols do not have the expected effect in some subjects (Orendáčová & Kvašňák, 2021). If we tune the neurofeedback/stimulation parameters (and/or assess their effects) at sensor level, we cannot know whether we are modulating the power or frequency of one or several alpha rhythms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial separation of different posterior alpha rhythms through ICA in single subjects could resolve some of the previous inconsistencies in the literature concerning the role of alpha phase, power and frequency in cognition (Michail et al, 2021; Pavlov & Kotchoubey, 2020; Samaha et al, 2020; Zazio et al, 2021). Similarly, separating different posterior alpha rhythms could allow us to understand why some neurofeedback and neurostimulation protocols do not have the expected effect in some subjects (Orendáčová & Kvašňák, 2021). If we tune the neurofeedback/stimulation parameters (and/or assess their effects) at sensor level, we cannot know whether we are modulating the power or frequency of one or several alpha rhythms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, separating different alpha rhythms could allow us to understand why some neurofeedback and neurostimulation protocols do not have the expected effect in some subjects (Orendáčová & Kvašňák, 2021). If we tune the neurofeedback/stimulation parameters (and/or assess their effects) at sensor level, we cannot know whether we are modulating the power or frequency of one or several alpha rhythms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial separation of different alpha rhythms could resolve some of the previous inconsistencies in the literature concerning the role of alpha phase, power and frequency in cognition ( Samaha et al, 2020 ; Michail et al, 2022 ; Pavlov and Kotchoubey, 2022 ; Zazio et al, 2022 ). Similarly, separating different alpha rhythms could allow us to understand why some neurofeedback and neurostimulation protocols do not have the expected effect in some subjects ( Orendáčová and Kvašňák, 2021 ). If we tune the neurofeedback/stimulation parameters (and/or assess their effects) at sensor level, we cannot know whether we are modulating the power or frequency of one or several alpha rhythms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further work is required to establish the validity of resting state EEG as a decisive criterion for the inclusion of individuals in NFB training. In future investigations, it may be possible to better understand the relationship between resting state EEG and neuromodulation capacity by using a neurostimulation technique such as transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on the trained frequency just before NFB training (Orendáčová & Kvašňák, 2021). The application of tACS allows the increase of endogenous neurophysiological activity by rhythmic stimulation (Liu et al, 2018;Zaghi et al, 2010).…”
Section: B Predictor Variables Of Neuromodulationmentioning
confidence: 99%