1992
DOI: 10.4141/cjas92-067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of transport stress and electrolyte supplementation on body fluids and weights of bulls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Packed cell volume was greater (P < 0.001) in sick cows in comparison with cows that were not sick, which was likely a result of reduced water intake. Overall, these findings agree with other authors who observed no difference in mean PCV in water-deprived cattle (Rumsey and Bond, 1976;Cole and Hutcheson, 1981;Gortel et al, 1992;Bjerg et al, 2005).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Packed cell volume was greater (P < 0.001) in sick cows in comparison with cows that were not sick, which was likely a result of reduced water intake. Overall, these findings agree with other authors who observed no difference in mean PCV in water-deprived cattle (Rumsey and Bond, 1976;Cole and Hutcheson, 1981;Gortel et al, 1992;Bjerg et al, 2005).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Serum osmolality appears to be a more sensitive indicator of changes in hydration status than PCV. Gortel et al (1992) found that extracellular fluid was used to maintain plasma volume in bulls that were denied access to water and feed in preslaughter lairage for 12 h. These authors also observed no difference in PCV between bulls that had ad libitum access to water and bulls that did not over the 12-h period. However, these authors recognized greater plasma osmolality in bulls that were denied water and feed access for 12 h than bulls that were allowed access to water over the same period.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Of particular importance are the effects of transportation duration on feed, water and rest intervals and which may result in physiological changes including dehydration, energy depletion, ion depletion, and protein catabolism (Gortel, Schaefer, Young, & Kawamoto, 1992;Schaefer, Dubeski, Aalhus, & Tong, 2001). In addition, the importance of pre-transportation nutrition and its role in reducing and meat quality aberrations on long journeys cannot be over looked (Schaefer et al, 2001).…”
Section: Transport Duration and Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the EU regulations state a maximum trip length of 30 h (European Commission (EC) (EC), 2005). Recent recommendations by EFSA (2011) state that adult cattle should not be transported longer than 29 h after which they should be rested for a 24 h recovery period with access to food and water.…”
Section: Transport Duration and Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lowest N:L ratio and blood glucose on sheeps drunk extract leaf might caused body weight loss lower than control, 2.22 vs 3.09% (Figure 4). Gortel et al (1992) have reported that sheeps had released many electrolyte ions in urine and feces, till reduced body weight and carcass quality after transportated. Solubility test used to determine the amount of dry Datura metel Linn.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%