2010
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Treatment Integrity Failures During Differential Reinforcement of Alternative Behavior: A Translational Model

Abstract: Differential reinforcement of alternative behavior (DRA) is used frequently as a treatment for problem behavior. Previous studies on treatment integrity failures during DRA suggest that the intervention is robust, but research has not yet investigated the effects of different types of integrity failures. We examined the effects of two types of integrity failures on DRA, starting with a human operant procedure and extending the results to children with disabilities in a school setting. Human operant results (Ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
85
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, both types of analyses of maintenance have shown that although DRA treatments are often effective in the short-term, the resurgence of problem behavior is common (Lattal & St. Peter Pipkin, 2009; Lieving, Hagopian, Long, & O’Connor, 2004; St. Peter Pipkin, Vollmer, & Sloman, 2010; Volkert, Lerman, Call, & Trosclair-Lasserre, 2009), even following long-term treatment (Wacker et al, 2011; Wacker, Harding, et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, both types of analyses of maintenance have shown that although DRA treatments are often effective in the short-term, the resurgence of problem behavior is common (Lattal & St. Peter Pipkin, 2009; Lieving, Hagopian, Long, & O’Connor, 2004; St. Peter Pipkin, Vollmer, & Sloman, 2010; Volkert, Lerman, Call, & Trosclair-Lasserre, 2009), even following long-term treatment (Wacker et al, 2011; Wacker, Harding, et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuing to implement treatment procedures when an extinction burst occurs is not likely to be viable for some caregivers when they must also care for another child who engages in problem behavior. In addition, treatments may need to be implemented with the high integrity or very dense schedules of reinforcement when first introduced (St. Peter Pipkin, Vollmer, & Sloman, 2010), which may be challenging. Even under more straightforward circumstances in which parents only have one child who engages in problem behavior, caregivers sometimes struggle to implement such effortful treatments with good fidelity (Allen & Warzak, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Mace et al (1986) were the first to describe the divided attention condition, results of their study showed that problem behavior was slightly lower in the divided attention condition than in the typical attention condition for both subjects. Additional studies (Fisher, Kuhn, & Thompson, 1998;Hagopian, Contrucci-Kuhn, Long, & Rush, 2005;Kahng, Hendrickson, & Vu, 2000;Mace et al, 2009;St. Peter Pipkin, Vollmer, & Sloman, 2010) have included both attention and divided attention conditions; however, when considered collectively, results of these studies were mixed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peter Pipkin, Vollmer, & Sloman, 2010) have included both attention and divided attention conditions; however, when considered collectively, results of these studies were mixed. Three subjects in the Fisher et al (1998), Mace et al (2009), andSt. Peter Pipkin et al (2010) studies engaged in higher levels of problem behavior in the divided attention condition than in the attention condition, whereas two subjects in the Hagopian et al (2005) and Kahng et al (2000) studies engaged in similar levels of problem behavior across both attention conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation