53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting 2015
DOI: 10.2514/6.2015-1923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Turbulence Model on Prediction of Hot-Gas Lateral Jet Interaction in a Supersonic Crossflow

Abstract: Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Informat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Christie [11] compared the numerical results of a flat plate and a missile with four turbulence models. DeSpirito [12] used nine turbulence models derived from standard one-and two-equation models to compare the jet interactions of cold air, hot air, and hot gas jet cases. The jet interactions of a generic missile at several jet conditions were investigated, and the effects of flux functions were compared in a previous numerical study [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Christie [11] compared the numerical results of a flat plate and a missile with four turbulence models. DeSpirito [12] used nine turbulence models derived from standard one-and two-equation models to compare the jet interactions of cold air, hot air, and hot gas jet cases. The jet interactions of a generic missile at several jet conditions were investigated, and the effects of flux functions were compared in a previous numerical study [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%