“…These results are only partially similar to those of the earlier Cochrane meta-analysis [8] but they are also stronger. In fact, compared to the previous work we: 1) included five more trials (accounting for ≈600 neonates); 2) used a trials aggregation based on the current best knowledge, that is, on the clinical equivalence of bovine surfactant [8]; 3) analyzed the effect of possible confounders, such as [46][47][48][49] ↓ Prostaglandins synthesis [50,51] ↓ PVR [46,47,[52][53][54] IVH ↓ PaCO2 and CBF [55][56][57] ↓ PDA [53,54] Better peripheral perfusion [34,42] Improved cerebral oxygenation [58] ROP ↓ oxygen and ROS exposure [49,[59][60][61][62][63] NEC ↓ oxygen and ROS exposure [49,64] Better peripheral perfusion [34,42] Earlier progression to full enteral feeding [65][66][67][68] More details in the text. Abbreviations: ROS Reactive oxygen species, PVR Pulmonary vascular resistances, CBF Cerebral blood flow, PaCO2 Arterial partial pressure of CO2, PDA Patent ductus arteriosus, IVH Intraventricular hemorrhage, ROP Retinopathy of prematurity, NEC Necrotizing enterocolitis antenatal steroids or gestational age, and finally, 4) reviewed the possible physiopathological mechanisms linking surfactant replacement and extra-pulmonary outcomes.…”