2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.08.149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of two-dimensional materials on human mesenchymal stem cell behaviors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No loss of cell viability was observed for any of the materials up to concentrations of 100 μg mL −1 . Furthermore, cells seeded onto the 2D material thin films showed strong interactions with the substrates, similar to what was observed in the previous study by Suhito et al 152 This favorable cell attachment and high biocompatibility have prompted further studies on the biological interactions of nanostructured films of 2D materials with different cell types, such as differentiation of stem cells. 154 Similar biocompatibility has also been reported for a number of polymer composites containing 2D materials.…”
Section: D Materials Hazard Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No loss of cell viability was observed for any of the materials up to concentrations of 100 μg mL −1 . Furthermore, cells seeded onto the 2D material thin films showed strong interactions with the substrates, similar to what was observed in the previous study by Suhito et al 152 This favorable cell attachment and high biocompatibility have prompted further studies on the biological interactions of nanostructured films of 2D materials with different cell types, such as differentiation of stem cells. 154 Similar biocompatibility has also been reported for a number of polymer composites containing 2D materials.…”
Section: D Materials Hazard Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…(B-D) Cell viability of the modified substrates after 2 days and 7 days as determined by growth rate using a CCK-8 assay. Figure adapted from reference 152 …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The immunoblot assay and immunofluorescence analysis indicated the Akt-mTOR-p70S6K signaling pathway played a critical role in the induction of cellular proliferation and differentiation by single-layer MoS 2 in HELFs (Zou et al, 2017). Based on the observation of cell morphology, human mesenchymal stem cells on MoS 2 film exhibited more active filopodial interaction with substrate compared to the control group, indicating that MoS 2 highly enhanced cell adhesion and spreading (Suhito et al, 2017). In human hepatoma HepG2 cells, MoS 2 nanosheets induced mitochondrial depolarization and elevated reactive oxygen species level (Liu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Biosafety Evaluation Of 2d Tmdcsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, the interaction between 2D TMDCs and cells certainly will disturb cell homeostasis. Further biosafety evaluation indicated that 2D TMDCs affected cell behaviors, such as cell proliferation, differentiation (Zou et al, 2017), cell adhesion, spreading (Suhito et al, 2017), oxidative stress (Yang et al, 2014), cell metabolism (Yu Y. et al, 2017), and cell autophagy . Singlelayer MoS 2 nanosheets promoted proliferation and accelerated myogenic differentiation in human embryonic lung fibroblasts (HELFs).…”
Section: Biosafety Evaluation Of 2d Tmdcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various nanobiomaterials (e.g., nanoparticles, porous polymers, and nanopatterning) have proven to be favorable in increasing cell spreading and focal adhesion through supportive topographical cues [21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. In this regard, the enhancement of the specific differentiation of various types of stem cells could also be influenced by the advantageous properties of biocompatible nanomaterials [28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%