2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c05648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Ultraviolet Illumination on Oxygen Interstitial Injection from TiO2 under Liquid Water

Abstract: Super-band-gap illumination influences the reaction rates of semiconducting oxide surfaces with gases and liquids, so it seems plausible that illumination also affects the analogous rates of surfaces with point defects in the interior of the solid. However, such effects have not been investigated. The present paper fills that gap by employing isotopic self-diffusion measurements to demonstrate ultraviolet-enhanced creation of oxygen interstitial atoms from rutile TiO 2 (110) surfaces exposed to liquid water. I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a binary oxide, rutile TiO 2 , the oxygen incorporation rate under water was improved by UV light illumination, compared to red light and dark condition. 52 The extra charges are only generated by super band gap illumination (like UV light) which possess a higher energy overcoming the band gap of rutile TiO 2 (3.1 eV). In LTO, absorption of infrared light was highly sensitive to intercalation of Li in the LTO lattice, in contrast to that of visible light.…”
Section: Computational Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a binary oxide, rutile TiO 2 , the oxygen incorporation rate under water was improved by UV light illumination, compared to red light and dark condition. 52 The extra charges are only generated by super band gap illumination (like UV light) which possess a higher energy overcoming the band gap of rutile TiO 2 (3.1 eV). In LTO, absorption of infrared light was highly sensitive to intercalation of Li in the LTO lattice, in contrast to that of visible light.…”
Section: Computational Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%