1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0169(1997)36:3<266::aid-cm7>3.0.co;2-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of ultraviolet-microbeam irradiation of kinetochores in crane-fly spermatocytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Backward chromosome movements in anaphase have been seen previously in crane-fly spermatocytes, but only rarely and only when the poleward force was blocked by UV microbeam irradiation [101,102]. However, chromosome arms, severed with a laser beam, regularly moved backwards [95].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Backward chromosome movements in anaphase have been seen previously in crane-fly spermatocytes, but only rarely and only when the poleward force was blocked by UV microbeam irradiation [101,102]. However, chromosome arms, severed with a laser beam, regularly moved backwards [95].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In grasshopper spermatocytes [104] there are fast backwards movements after UV irradiation of the kinetochore in early anaphase. Ilagan and Forer [101], LaFountain et al [95] and Wong and Forer [102] all considered that there are mechanical connections between the arms of separating half-bivalents in crane-fly spermatocytes and that these connections, or "tethers"[95], elastically cause the backwards movements. Even though the tethers act on both partner half-bivalents, the backwards movements need not be symmetric, with both partners moving equally, because in all previous observations only one chromosome (or arm) moved, the one no longer attached to the pole.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, tethers are responsible for, or at least are required for, regulating the speeds of separating partner chromosomes. Extending this conclusion, we assume that when both partners stop moving after UV microbeam irradiation of only one kinetochore fibre (Figure 1; Forer, 1966;Sillers and Forer, 1981a,b;Adames and Forer, 1996;Yin and Forer, 1996;Ilagan and Forer, 1997) the stoppage of the partner chromosome (moving to the opposite pole) is due to tethers. Consistent with this is that UV microbeam irradiation of the interzone uncouples the movements of the separating anaphase chromosomes: after first irradiating the interzone, the chromosome associated with the irradiated kinetochore spindle fibre stops moving -the partner moves normally (Yin and Forer, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…When irradiation of one kinetochore fibre stopped the anaphase movement of the associated chromosome, the partner chromosome moving to the opposite pole also stopped moving (Forer, 1966;Sillers and Forer, 1981a,b;Adames and Forer, 1996;Yin and Forer, 1996;Ilagan and Forer, 1997); the other chromosomes were not affected, as illustrated in Figure 1. UV microbeam irradiation of the interzone uncoupled the separating chromosomes in that only the chromosome attached to the irradiated spindle fibre stopped moving, not its partner (Yin and Forer, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We also often have followed several spermatocytes consecutively from metaphase through anaphase, or prometaphase through anaphase, with no apparent deleterious changes in the later cells. Crane-fly spermatocytes in clots act the same as spermatocytes smeared under oil using every criterion we have looked at, namely time intervals between nuclear membrane breakdown and anaphase (Forer and Pickett-Heaps, 1998b;LaFountain et al, 2001;Silverman-Gavrila and Forer, 2001), velocities of autosome movements during anaphase (Forer, 1965;Schaap and Forer, 1979;Yin and Forer, 1996;Ilagan and Forer, 1997;LaFountain et al, 2001;Forer, 2003, spermatocytes under oil, compared with Forer andPickett-Heaps, 1998b;Silverman-Gavrila and Forer, 2001;, spermatocytes in clots), time intervals between onset of autosomal anaphase and subsequent sexchromosome anaphase (Schaap andForer, 1979, under oil, compared with Forer andPickett-Heaps, 1998b;Silverman-Gavrila and Forer, 2001, in clots), behaviours of severed spindle fibres and associated chromosomes after ultraviolet microbeam irradiation of spindle fibres (Forer, 1965(Forer, , 1966Wilson and Forer, 1988;Spurck et al, 1997, under oil, compared with Forer et al, 2003, and general appearances of cells and chromosomes. Nor does periodic flow of solution past the cells seem to harm the cells: anaphase velocities are not perturbed by flow of Ringer's solution or DMSO (Forer and Pickett-Heaps, 1998a, b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%