1977
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00540.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Unanticipated Self-Disclosure on Recipients of Varying Levels of Self-Esteem: A Research Note

Abstract: Assuming that another's self-disclosure can be rewarding, it was hypothesized that attraction for one who disclosed a relatively high amount of personal information would be greater than attraction for a low discloser when the disclosure was perceived as being appropriate. Also, it was hypothesized that persons of high self-esteem may be more attracted to a high discloser than persons of moderate or low self-esteem. An experiment examined the effects of a confederate's self-disclosure (high or low degree of pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When a person receives private information that is unsolicited, the information is communicated unexpectedly (Gilbert, 1977). In this case, the receiving spouse will likely try to identify the purpose for the information and the expectations for a response.…”
Section: Attributional Searchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When a person receives private information that is unsolicited, the information is communicated unexpectedly (Gilbert, 1977). In this case, the receiving spouse will likely try to identify the purpose for the information and the expectations for a response.…”
Section: Attributional Searchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The macro assumptions in this theory suggest, first, that the recipient is a critical factor in the disclosure equation. The receiver of unsolicited disclosure has been largely ignored, with the exception of Gilbert's (1977) work. We know very little about how recipients respond to disclosure and learn to cope with information that they did not request.…”
Section: Macro Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Norm violators are not liked by others, regardless of the intimacy of the disclosure (Chaikin & Derlega, 1974), so the handicapped individual must attempt to disclose at a time in the conversation when it is consistent with the previous topic. Gilbert (1977) defines inappropriate disclosure as that which is unanticipated and communicated at a time when the other participant has no opportunity to respond. This guideline may help the disabled person make decisions about disclosure, and may help future researchers examine the role of appropriateness in disclosure about a handicap.…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Wheeless, 1976). (Wheeless & Grotz, 1979, (Gilbert, 1977. (Wheeless & Grotz, 1977), (Thompson & Seibold.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Greenblatt el al., 1980). SELF-ESTEEM (Gilbert, 1977), . SELF-REPORTS (Hewes & Haight, 1980 Cody, 1982).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%