2010
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-7-23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of unilateral robotic limb loading on gait characteristics in subjects with chronic stroke

Abstract: BackgroundHemiparesis after stroke often leads to impaired ankle motor control that impacts gait function. In recent studies, robotic devices have been developed to address this impairment. While capable of imparting forces to assist during training and gait, these devices add mass to the paretic leg which might encumber patients' gait pattern. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of the added mass of one of these robots, the MIT's Anklebot, while unpowered, on gait of chronic stroke survivors d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has low friction (0.744 N·m) and inertia (0.8 kg per actuator for a total of 1.6 kg at the foot) to maximize the backdriveability. A previous study has shown that unilaterally loading the impaired leg with the additional mass of the anklebot had no detrimental effect on the gait pattern in subjects with chronic hemiparesis (Khanna et al 2010).…”
Section: Anklebotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has low friction (0.744 N·m) and inertia (0.8 kg per actuator for a total of 1.6 kg at the foot) to maximize the backdriveability. A previous study has shown that unilaterally loading the impaired leg with the additional mass of the anklebot had no detrimental effect on the gait pattern in subjects with chronic hemiparesis (Khanna et al 2010).…”
Section: Anklebotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…* The anklebot can estimate ankle kinematics and kinetics with a very high degree of precision [19] and can be used as an effective clinical measurement instrument in estimating paretic ankle stiffness [21][22]. Walking with the unpowered anklebot as an added mass on the paretic leg does not interfere or significantly alter gait kinematics [23].…”
Section: Apparatus (Anklebot)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weight can further be distributed over the body by suspending the device with shoulder strap, running up over the shoulder and neck, as in Roy et al (2007). Please note, it has been shown in the literature that, unilaterally loading the impaired leg of chronic hemiparesis patients with an additional mass of 3.6 kg due to an ankle rehabilitation device does not cause detrimental effects on the gait pattern of subjects (Khanna et al 2010). Table 2 lists the specifications of the device in both modes.…”
Section: Implementation Of Assiston-anklementioning
confidence: 98%