2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2017.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of univariate and multivariate regression on the accuracy of hydrogen quantification with laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This uncertainty in predicting water content is high, but averaging the prediction for multiple (5-10) ChemCam observation points in a typical raster of a single target, assuming the H content is constant, the uncertainty decreases to ±0.8 wt.% H 2 O. This is within the uncertainty in predicting H content with LIBS estimated by Ytsma and Dyar (2018) of ±1.5 wt.% H 2 O.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This uncertainty in predicting water content is high, but averaging the prediction for multiple (5-10) ChemCam observation points in a typical raster of a single target, assuming the H content is constant, the uncertainty decreases to ±0.8 wt.% H 2 O. This is within the uncertainty in predicting H content with LIBS estimated by Ytsma and Dyar (2018) of ±1.5 wt.% H 2 O.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The variables corresponding to these β = 0 were regarded as non-significant variables to be discarded directly. The penalty method took the value when the penalty likelihood function was the smallest as the estimated value of the regression coefficient [27,37]. Five-fold cross-validation was also applied to establish the Lasso calibration model and confirm the best model parameter the boundary value t, which is analogous to LVs for PLS and the number of non-zero β, which is expressed as either t in the optimization equation or the number of steps in the step-wise procedure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most metallic elements and some metalloid elements such as boron and silicon, with a high enough concentration with respect to the limit of detection of the LIBS technique, have been quantified in rocks, minerals and soils. 1,3 Nonmetal elements analyzed in geological materials using LIBS include carbon, 6 nitrogen, 7 oxygen, 8 fluorine, 9 phosphorus, 10 sulfur, 11 chlorine 12 and hydrogen, 13 with a much lower quantitative analysis performance than for metallic and metalloid elements, and often allow only qualitative analysis 1 due to the high excitation energies of these elements and their important chemical reactivity. Such still modest performance for nonmetal element analysis already presents great potential and has induced many development efforts, since comparable techniques which are able to provide fast and in situ elemental analysis, X-ray fluorescence (XRF) for example, are limited by poor detection limits for light elements and are in particular not suitable for analysis of hydrogen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%