Effects of UV treatment on orthodontic microimplant surface after autoclaving

Tejani, Harsh; Venugopal, Adith; Yu, Won Jae; Hee-Moon, Kyung

doi:10.14815/kjdm.2017.44.2.119

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, in this study, to use the same baseline between the experimental group and the control group, the same consequent five implant threads were measured [24]. This result is reliable and can be strongly supported by other recent studies [30,31]. Mehl et al noted that low BIC values were observed in both the UV-irradiated and non-irradiated groups, and the results showed no statistically significant differences [30].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 80%

“…Mehl et al noted that low BIC values were observed in both the UV-irradiated and nonirradiated groups, and the results showed no statistically significant differences [30]. Tejani et al also found that osteoblast activity in UV-treated titanium samples is not significantly different from that of untreated samples, which contradicts the recently known effects of photofunctionalization [31].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 93%

“…Takebe et al stated that macrophages act as an important source for osteoinduction and affect the bone formation on the surface of implants by determining the biological responses [38]. Thus, photofunctionalization alone may not affect the overall process of osseointegration [30,31]. Osteogenesis around the endosseous implant is not facilitated independently by any one factor exclusively but, by the role of countless cytokines and proteins, the adsorption power of the clots and the long-term peri-implant environment such as cell occlusion, tissue integration, locoregional factors, and a number of systemic metabolism [39,40].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Effect of Ultraviolet Irradiation on Osseointegration of Dental Implants: A Comparative Histomorphometric Study in Canine Models

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent studies have focused on achieving sound osseointegration applying methods of surface reprocessing of dental implants using ultraviolet (UV) irradiation. However, there have been few reports on the effect of UV irradiation on osseointegration in both the short and long term, and experimental studies using the canine model do not exist. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the short- and long-term degree of osseointegration of dental implants according to UV irradiation using a histometric analysis in canine models. Four beagles were used for this study and 24 dental implants were placed. Six implants were inserted with flapless protocols in each mandible. Half of the implants were UV-irradiated prior to implantation. UV-treated and untreated implants were placed one after the other; implant stability was recorded using the implant stability test (IST) immediately after implantation and every seven days thereafter. Two of the beagles were sacrificed after four weeks and the other two after 12 weeks. The implants were removed in block sections and were evaluated histomorphologically and statistically. As a result, we found no statistically significant differences in the mean IST values and in bone-to-implant contact (BIC) in all groups at 4 and 12 weeks.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 80%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 93%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effect of Ultraviolet Irradiation on Osseointegration of Dental Implants: A Comparative Histomorphometric Study in Canine Models

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Surface Treatment of Dental Mini-Sized Implants and Screws: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Figueiredo,

Travassos,

Nunes

et al. 2024

JFB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Miniscrews are devices that allow for absolute skeletal anchorage. However, their use has a higher failure rate (10–30%) than dental implants (10%). To overcome these flaws, chemical and/or mechanical treatment of the surface of miniscrews has been suggested. There is no consensus in the current literature about which of these methods is the gold standard; thus, our objective was to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on surface treatments of miniscrews. The review protocol was registered (PROSPERO CRD42023408011) and is in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. A bibliographic search was carried out on PubMed via MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science. The initial search of the databases yielded 1684 results, with 98 studies included in the review, with one article originating from the search in the bibliographic references of the included studies. The results of this systematic review show that the protocols of miniscrew surface treatments, such as acid-etching; sandblasting, large-grit and acid-etching; photofunctionalization with ultraviolet light; and photobiomodulation, can increase stability and the success of orthodontic treatment. The meta-analysis revealed that the treatment with the highest removal torque is SLA, followed by acid-etching. On the other hand, techniques such as oxidative anodization, anodization with pre-calcification and heat treatment, as well as deposition of chemical compounds, require further investigation to confirm their effectiveness.

show abstract

Effects of UV treatment on orthodontic microimplant surface after autoclaving

Cited by 2 publications

References 20 publications

Effect of Ultraviolet Irradiation on Osseointegration of Dental Implants: A Comparative Histomorphometric Study in Canine Models

Effect of Ultraviolet Irradiation on Osseointegration of Dental Implants: A Comparative Histomorphometric Study in Canine Models

Surface Treatment of Dental Mini-Sized Implants and Screws: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About