2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2018.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of valproate on brain volumes in pediatric bipolar disorder: A preliminary study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, we considered a PP ≥ 75% that an effect of treatment exists worthy of further investigation; disparate researchers can and should consider their own subjective probability threshold that an effect exists. We chose this value for its (a) consistency with previous work using these data (Ahn et al, 2018), (b) similarity to thresholds researchers chose in other recent trials investigating treatment effects (Bauer et al, 2018; Cazala et al, 2018; Schmitz et al, 2017), and (c) correspondence with the scientific and clinical opinion of the present research team that the current research would be worthy of further investigation if there was at least a 3 in 4 chance that the alternative hypothesis was correct. For further justification of the use of Bayesian inference in the present study (including a brief discussion of frequentist vs. Bayesian inference), see a previous inspection of these data regarding the effects of tDCS on experimental pain measures (Ahn et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the present study, we considered a PP ≥ 75% that an effect of treatment exists worthy of further investigation; disparate researchers can and should consider their own subjective probability threshold that an effect exists. We chose this value for its (a) consistency with previous work using these data (Ahn et al, 2018), (b) similarity to thresholds researchers chose in other recent trials investigating treatment effects (Bauer et al, 2018; Cazala et al, 2018; Schmitz et al, 2017), and (c) correspondence with the scientific and clinical opinion of the present research team that the current research would be worthy of further investigation if there was at least a 3 in 4 chance that the alternative hypothesis was correct. For further justification of the use of Bayesian inference in the present study (including a brief discussion of frequentist vs. Bayesian inference), see a previous inspection of these data regarding the effects of tDCS on experimental pain measures (Ahn et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Outside the cerebellum, most studies of the effect of ASMs on neuroimaging focus on differences observed on functional MRI [117]. One study demonstrated decreased amygdalar volume in adolescents with bipolar disorder and a 6-week exposure to valproate [118].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%