1995
DOI: 10.1519/1533-4287(1995)009<0222:eovotb>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Variations of the Bench Press Exercise on the EMG Activity of Five Shoulder Muscles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

11
60
3
5

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
11
60
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies using experienced weightlifters reported that moving from a narrow (100% of BAD) to a wider pronated grip (200% of BAD) width increased muscle activity in the sternoclavicular portion of the pectoralis major and decreased triceps brachii activity [13,14]. However, grip width appeared to have no influence on muscle activity in the clavicular portion of the pectoralis major muscle [13,14]. in this study, the MTH measurement site of the pectoralis major was between the third and fourth costa under the clavicle midpoint, where previous studies have found no differences in muscle activation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Previous studies using experienced weightlifters reported that moving from a narrow (100% of BAD) to a wider pronated grip (200% of BAD) width increased muscle activity in the sternoclavicular portion of the pectoralis major and decreased triceps brachii activity [13,14]. However, grip width appeared to have no influence on muscle activity in the clavicular portion of the pectoralis major muscle [13,14]. in this study, the MTH measurement site of the pectoralis major was between the third and fourth costa under the clavicle midpoint, where previous studies have found no differences in muscle activation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…The authors reported that a given percentage of 1RM allows an exacerbated number of repetitions for some exercises and a reduced number for others. Thus, studies with this methodology, such as the ones by Barnett et al (16) , Glass and Armstrong (17) and Bompa and Cornacchia (8) , should be carefully analyzed, once the procedure itself may lead to differences in the exercises due to the overestimation or underestimation of the muscular capacity in different movements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results corroborate the study by Glass and Armstrong [18] in which electromyographic data revealed no significant differences in the activation of the upper part of the pectoralis major between incline and decline bench press. However, in the study by Barnett et al [19], the clavicular part showed a similar activity for the incline and the horizontal bench press and it showed less activity during the decline bench press. Trebs et al [4] observed that the clavicular part showed a significantly higher activity in the incline bench press compared with the horizontal modality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%