1981
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1981.53.3.739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Varying Ball Diameters on Catching Ability of Young Children

Abstract: 10 bogs and 10 girls ( 6 0 subjects) were randomly selected from kindergarten, first, and second grades. Each subject attempted to catch balls of 6-, 8.5-, lo-, and 13-in. diameters through 28 trials (seven attempts per ball per subject). A special apparatus was designed to roll the ball consistently into the subject's arms fron: a horizonral distance of approximately 4 ft. The quality of each attempted catch was evaluated using a five-point scale. The main effects of ball size, grade, and sex were significant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, is it easier to catch a small ball or a large one? Herkowitz (1978) suggests that it is easier to catch a medium and a large ball than a small ball (Table I), and she is supported by the research of DuRandt (1985), Meadley (1941), Payne (1985), and Payne and Koslow (1981). However, results of studies by Gutteridge (1939) To further complicate the issue, Haywood (1986) notes that while children may be more successful in catching a larger ball, they also are likely to exhibit more mature catching form with smaller balls (which is contrary to the observations of Wellman, 1937).…”
Section: Developmental Task Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For example, is it easier to catch a small ball or a large one? Herkowitz (1978) suggests that it is easier to catch a medium and a large ball than a small ball (Table I), and she is supported by the research of DuRandt (1985), Meadley (1941), Payne (1985), and Payne and Koslow (1981). However, results of studies by Gutteridge (1939) To further complicate the issue, Haywood (1986) notes that while children may be more successful in catching a larger ball, they also are likely to exhibit more mature catching form with smaller balls (which is contrary to the observations of Wellman, 1937).…”
Section: Developmental Task Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Smaller balls that fit into hands are easier to throw but somewhat larger balls are easier to catch (Payne cj, Koslow, 1981). When choosing balls for a class activity, the choice of the balls may depend on whether the lesson focuses on throwing or catching.…”
Section: Modification/manipulation To Improve Performance Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children do better in catching a medium or large ball, which is well known, among the studies. For example, Payne (1982) specified the diverse features of the catching tasks in the early studies and reported that some studies concluded that small ball gave more successes to 4-6 year old children (Gutteridge, 1939;Isaacs, 1980) and; others concluded that with medium and large balls they scored better (Meadly, 1941;Payne & Koslow, 1981). By using ETA terms, we may simply define the factors the above studies disregarded: (1) inconsistency in distance, speed, and trajectory of projection toward catchers as in consideration of environment and task parameters; (2) mixed findings reported from either within subject comparison or between subject comparison studies, regardless of catchers" characteristics.…”
Section: --Suggestions ----------------------------------------------mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of task and environmental variables in ballistic movement was examined by the studies on traditional task analysis approach. They indentified the variables, size of ball, changes in colors and patterns of background, which were hypothesized to affect on perception and performance of ballistic skill (Isaacs, 1972;Morris, 1976;Payne, 1982;Payne, & Koslow, 1981;Ridenour, 1974Ridenour, , 1979. The findings from the studies, however, failed to lead to a consensus concerning the effects of physical dimensions (e.g., the ball size) on a task and assessment in changes in receiving patterns, the emergence of specific movements, in accordance with varying task dimensions (e.g., size of object, velocity of object, feeding an object from various distances).…”
Section: The Limitations Of Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation