1975
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1031(75)80026-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of varying exposure to another person with familiar or unfamiliar thought processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“….’ hypothesis, individuals who are more similar are more likely to become friends as well as to stay friends. People who are similar are often seen to have a greater ability to provide relevant rewards than those who are dissimilar (Brickman et al, 1975). In addition, friends who stay together have more time to have influence upon each other.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“….’ hypothesis, individuals who are more similar are more likely to become friends as well as to stay friends. People who are similar are often seen to have a greater ability to provide relevant rewards than those who are dissimilar (Brickman et al, 1975). In addition, friends who stay together have more time to have influence upon each other.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although children and adolescents may look to make friends with people who share similar characteristics (Brickman, Meyer, & Fredd, 1975), potential friends may be defined by pre‐assorted systems such as neighborhoods, classes, and activities that limit the variation of attributes. For example, children and adolescents are introduced to others with similar interests on their soccer team or dance class.…”
Section: Friendship Similaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information about another's similarity is frequently interpreted to mean that the other is likely to be benevolent (146,159,292,297), to be compati ble (303), or to have greater ability than a dissimilar other to provide rewards (42). The other's similarity also makes it seem more likely that he will like us in return (141, 150,153,179).…”
Section: Impressions Of Cognitive Compatibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information about another individual's similarity is often interpreted as an indicator of the other's benevolence (Johnson and Johnson, 1972;Sole et al, 1975;Stapleton et al, 1973;Huston and Levinger, 1978) or competence (Huston and Levinger, 1978;Brickman et al, 1975). Thus, we propose: H 4a: Cognitive homophily has a direct positive impact on the source's benevolence-based trustworthiness.…”
Section: Homophily Trustworthiness and Willingness To Accept Advicementioning
confidence: 98%