2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Vocal Training on Singing and Speaking Voice Characteristics in Vocally Healthy Adults and Children Based on Choral and Nonchoral Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
31
0
13

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
8
31
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the following main question remains: which of the methods and voice parameters are the most sensitive to voice training and could better quantitatively describe voice quality, as well as assess voice training effect. According to the literature, to achieve this purpose VRP along with SRP are proposed as relevant methods [4][5][6][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Findings of the present study support this opinion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the following main question remains: which of the methods and voice parameters are the most sensitive to voice training and could better quantitatively describe voice quality, as well as assess voice training effect. According to the literature, to achieve this purpose VRP along with SRP are proposed as relevant methods [4][5][6][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Findings of the present study support this opinion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Several research works have shown that voice training has a quantifiable effect on voice capabilities, mostly on VRP parameters [4,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Measurements derived from the VRP are useful in identifying voices which are well-equipped; in the diagnosis of vocal dysfunction; in suggesting starting points for voice training and in controlling training effectiveness or outcomes of the treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They reported no significant differences in SFF between different elicitation tasks. Siupsinskiene & Lycke [29] investigated average speaking fundamental frequency for adult males and females. They reported that the range of SFF for men was 89.0-175.0 Hz with a mean of 112.4 Hz, while the range for females was 164.5-260.0 Hz with a mean of 212.4 Hz.…”
Section: Maximum Phonation Time (Mpt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average standard deviation of fundamental frequency (F0,SD) for both men and women is 25 to 30 Hz [25]. Using pitch sigma, Siupsinskiene & Lycke [29] reported that men have a range of 7.5 to 21.0 with a mean of 14.5 while females have a range of 5.2 to 16.1 with a mean of 10.7.…”
Section: Maximum Phonation Time (Mpt)mentioning
confidence: 99%