2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of water chemistry and loading conditions on stress corrosion cracking of cold-rolled 316NG stainless steel in high temperature water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[10][11][12][13][17][18][19][22][23][24][25][26] CGRs of sensitised 304SS and solution annealed non-sensitised stainless steels increased monotonically with electrochemical potential, which tended to reach a plateau at high DO concentrations where corrosion potential and CGR were not sensitive to DO in this range. Decreasing electrode potential moderately inhibited crack growth of prior hardened austenitic stainless steels in high temperature pure water, which was less significant than that of sensitised 304 stainless steels and as solution annealed low C stainless steels in similar environments.…”
Section: Effects Of Do Concentration On Scc Growth Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13][17][18][19][22][23][24][25][26] CGRs of sensitised 304SS and solution annealed non-sensitised stainless steels increased monotonically with electrochemical potential, which tended to reach a plateau at high DO concentrations where corrosion potential and CGR were not sensitive to DO in this range. Decreasing electrode potential moderately inhibited crack growth of prior hardened austenitic stainless steels in high temperature pure water, which was less significant than that of sensitised 304 stainless steels and as solution annealed low C stainless steels in similar environments.…”
Section: Effects Of Do Concentration On Scc Growth Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the SCC statistics identified in the French PWRs by Couvant et al [1], most of the cases were identified after a period of at least of 50000 hours. Literature results also indicate that the water chemistry [9][10][11], testing temperature [12], degree and paths of pre-strain [9,10,13,14] and surface finish [15][16][17] and heat treatment are the main factors that influence SCC. Furthermore, when austenitic stainless steels are exposed to high temperature water, a double layer structured oxide layer forms, which consists of a fine grained, compact, and chromium-rich inner oxide layer Kruska et al and Lozano-Perez suggest that the oxidation which preferentially occurs along the grain boundaries and slip bands could be one of the possible reasons for the occurrence of SCC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to previous studies, published papers related to the effect of machining on SCC were mainly focused on the integrative working such as rolling and forging. Lu et al believed that the cold‐rolled processing has promising effect on increasing the random and Σ3 grain boundaries of 316NG SS, which finally promoted crack initiation when serviced in nuclear power plant. Meng et al indicated that the crack propagation mode was translated from transgranular (TG) to intergranular (IG) after cold rolling of 316NG SS when tested in high temperature water rich in dissolved hydrogen (DH) concentrations at 320 °C.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%