The effects of salmon farm inputs on pelagic nutrient concentrations and planktonic microbial abundance and biomass were investigated in Loch Fyne, a temperate fjordic environment off the west coast of Scotland. The concentration of photosynthetic pigments and inorganic and organic nutrients, and the abundance and biomass of the autotrophic and heterotrophic microorganisms, were determined over a complete annual cycle from 3 depths (5, 15 and 25-30 m) at 4 stations located at differing proximities to the fish farm. Ammonium and dissolved organic nitrogen concentrations and heterotrophic microbial abundance and biomass were significantly higher at the stations nearest to the fish farm, suggesting that these and other nutrients derived from the fish farm may be directly or indirectly enhancing heterotrophic microbial activity. This in turn suggests that the heterotrophic microbial food web was responsible, at least in part, for processing matter and energy released into the pelagic environment from the salmon farm. By contrast, pigment concentrations, including chlorophyll a, tended to be similar at all stations, supporting the conclusions of previous studies that failed to establish a clear relationship between fish farm inputs and phytoplankton biomass. As such, the response of the heterotrophic microbial community is probably a more appro-priate indicator than chlorophyll concentration of local ecological effects of fish farms in temperate coastal waters.
KEY WORDS: Fish farm · Plankton community · Bacteria · Nutrients · Chlorophyll
Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisherMar Ecol Prog Ser 361: [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58] 2008 sediment oxygen demand, leading to increases in sulphate reduction, increased inorganic nutrient fluxes and often profound, if spatially limited, effects on the benthic ecosystem. By contrast, relatively few studies have examined the effects of fish farm inputs on the pelagic environment and planktonic ecosystem structure and function (see review in Beveridge 1996, Pitta et al. 1999, Alongi et al. 2003.The most likely means by which inputs from fish farm cages may influence planktonic ecosystems is via alteration of inorganic and organic nutrient pools; although reduced light attenuation and the presence of pollutants (e.g. metals, antibiotics) may also play a role. Dissolved inorganic nutrients are released into the pelagic environment from fish farm cages either directly, as fish excretory products (ammonium and urea), or indirectly as a result of remineralisation of particulate organic waste. Such inorganic nutrient inputs have the potential to enhance the growth of phytoplankton and the formation of harmful phytoplankton blooms has been attributed to aquaculture inputs (e.g. Sorokin et al. 1996). They may also lead to changes in phytoplankton community composition via altered nutrient ratios with, for example, an increased N:Si ratio favouring the growth of flagellates rather than diatoms (Officer & Ryther 1980). ...