1990
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1127(90)90154-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of water, nutrients and their interactions on tree growth, and plantation forest management practices in Australasia: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unexpectedly, the lowest productivity of the plantation studied in northern Spain coincided with the area with highest rainfall. Radiata pine appears to be particularly intolerant to soil waterlogging (Boomsma and Hunter, 1990), but the steep slopes of the rainy sites under study make it difficult to attribute the low productivity of these sites to this process. In any case, the most humid et al (2002) have studied a 47 set plot of radiata pine plantations in northwest Spain and have not found significant impact of parent material on SI.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Unexpectedly, the lowest productivity of the plantation studied in northern Spain coincided with the area with highest rainfall. Radiata pine appears to be particularly intolerant to soil waterlogging (Boomsma and Hunter, 1990), but the steep slopes of the rainy sites under study make it difficult to attribute the low productivity of these sites to this process. In any case, the most humid et al (2002) have studied a 47 set plot of radiata pine plantations in northwest Spain and have not found significant impact of parent material on SI.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Grasses and herbaceous broad-leaved weed species are commonly found during crop establishment and constitute a major impediment to the successful early growth and development of tree crops (knowe et al 1985, Boomsma and Hunter 1990, Richardson 1993, Savill et al 1997, Adams et al 2003. Weed interference can range from the significant suppression of crop growth to widespread crop mortality (Adams et al 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While no scientific papers were found in literature regarding the effect of Increased growth in response to weed control is usually explained in terms of improved access of the trees to water (Sands and Nambiar 1984) or nutrients (Ellis et al 1985, Smethurst and Nambiar 1989, örlander et al 1996. This access leads to the enhancement of the trees' physiological activity (Boomsma and Hunter 1990, Richardson 1993, Mohammed et al 1998, leading to an increase in the leaf area, light interception and photosynthetic activity of the crop (Adams et al 2003). In this study, when the weeds were controlled during the first year of the investigation, the leaf number increased 122%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because plantation forestry was often relegated to land with low agricultural potential (Boomsma and Hunter, 1990;Hunter and Smith, 1996), fertilization has been an effective management tool permitting the New Zealand forestry sector to produce fast-growing P. radiata plantations in nutrient-deficient areas (Mead and Gadgil, 1978;Mead, 2005b). There are a large number of empirical studies reporting growth responses to fertilization, dosages, and the environmental risks associated with the use of fertilizers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%