2004
DOI: 10.1080/11250000409356614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of water pollution on the proliferative activity in the developing frog brain

Abstract: In the present research encephalons were considered from an early larval stage of the frog (Sana klepton esculentd). The animals were divided into two groups, i.e., control (CL) and contaminated (CT) frogs, on the basis of chemical analyses. Proliferating activity was evaluated in brain sections after immunoreaction with an anti-PCNA (Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen) antibody. The results showed the presence of many immunolabelled cell nuclei in the ventricular walls of the encephalic vesicles, but the patt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PCNA is an easy, endogenous marker that photographs several phases of the cell cycle at the time when the animal is killed and could then give a wide picture of the cell proliferation in the neurogenic process. A detailed neuroanatomical mapping of cell proliferation in the brain of R. esculenta and R. catesbeiana has been made during larval development, metamorphosis and adults using PCNA as a marker (Guioli et al 2004;Margotta et al 2005;Raucci et al 2006;Simmons et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCNA is an easy, endogenous marker that photographs several phases of the cell cycle at the time when the animal is killed and could then give a wide picture of the cell proliferation in the neurogenic process. A detailed neuroanatomical mapping of cell proliferation in the brain of R. esculenta and R. catesbeiana has been made during larval development, metamorphosis and adults using PCNA as a marker (Guioli et al 2004;Margotta et al 2005;Raucci et al 2006;Simmons et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%