2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2015.08.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of wavelength and number of bends on the performance of zigzag demisters with drainage channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that the low Re k‐ε model is more superior than other turbulence models; Zamora and Kaiser 12 evaluated the performance for four types of wave plate mist eliminators that are commonly used in cooling towers through numerical calculations, studied the influence of turbulent droplet diffusion, inertial parameters, and the height‐to‐width ratio of separator channel. Besides, they developed a program which used to determine the functional relationship between total demisting efficiency and other parameters; Hamedi‐Estakhrsar and Rafee 13 studied the effects of the change in the number of stages and bending size of “Z” type demister with drainage channel on the separation efficiency and pressure drop. It was concluded that the increase or decrease of bending number or size would significantly improve pressure drop and droplet removal efficiency; Shen 14 analyzed the impact of collision and coalescence between droplets, the fragmentation of droplets by airflow, and the interaction between droplets and wall on separation efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the low Re k‐ε model is more superior than other turbulence models; Zamora and Kaiser 12 evaluated the performance for four types of wave plate mist eliminators that are commonly used in cooling towers through numerical calculations, studied the influence of turbulent droplet diffusion, inertial parameters, and the height‐to‐width ratio of separator channel. Besides, they developed a program which used to determine the functional relationship between total demisting efficiency and other parameters; Hamedi‐Estakhrsar and Rafee 13 studied the effects of the change in the number of stages and bending size of “Z” type demister with drainage channel on the separation efficiency and pressure drop. It was concluded that the increase or decrease of bending number or size would significantly improve pressure drop and droplet removal efficiency; Shen 14 analyzed the impact of collision and coalescence between droplets, the fragmentation of droplets by airflow, and the interaction between droplets and wall on separation efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to these assumptions, the factors influencing the separation efficiency including the geometry and distance of the channels, droplet diameters, physical properties of the gas and liquid, and velocities 3, 4 were studied experimentally and/or numerically. Zamora et al 5 Estakhrsar and Rafee, 6, 7 Kauousi, 8 Rafee et al 9 and Liu et al 10 studied the influence of the geometrical parameters, such as the bend number and angle, distance between the parallel plates, length between two successive bends, and drainage channels, on the separation performance of vane demisters. Wilkinson, 11 Koopman et al 12 and Banitabaei et al 13 studied the relationship between the separation efficiency and pressure drop for different the waveplate parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a particle or droplet contained in the gas passes through the narrow channels between plates, those particles or droplets with high inertial force collide with the wall because they cannot follow the streamline as it repeatedly changes. Thus, collected particles or droplets collect on the wall to form a liquid film, which is drained by gravity (James and Wang, 1998;Melaaen and Jøsang, 2002;Azzopardi et al, 2003;Kulasekharan et al, 2013;Fan et al, 2015;Hamedi Estakhrsar et al, 2016). Due to this removal mechanism, existing ME do not effectively remove mists if the flow velocity is low or particle size is small; increasing the particle size or flow velocity increases the mist removal efficiency (Jiang et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%