Effects of Web‐based Career Identity Training for Stress Management among Japanese Nurses: A Randomized Control Trial

Yamagishi, Masahiko; Kobayashi, Toshio; Nakamura, Yuko

doi:10.1539/joh.l7086

Cited by 35 publications

(57 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Four interventions were focused on some form of worker welfare: Two demonstrated no effects on well-being (van den Heuvel, Demerouti, and Peeters 2015; Van Wingerden, Derks, and Bakker 2017) and two demonstrated at least one positive effect on well-being (Le Blanc et al 2007;Shonin et al 2014). For those interventions not specifically targeted at worker welfare, four demonstrated at least one positive effect on worker well-being (Cohen and Gagin 2005;Coogle, Head, and Parham 2006;Ellis, Hutman, and Chapin 2015;Glisson et al 2012) and one had no effect on well-being (Yamagishi, Kobayashi, and Nakamura 2008). Training to improve job design may be relatively cheap and relatively straightforward to implement compared to other interventions considered in this review.…”

Section: Promisingmentioning

confidence: 93%

“…Three studies indicated no effects on well-being (van den Heuvel, Demerouti, and Peeters 2015; Van Wingerden, Derks, and Bakker 2017;Yamagishi, Kobayashi, and Nakamura 2008). Of the two studies that assessed job design, one indicated no effects on job design (Yamagishi, Kobayashi, and Nakamura 2008) and one indicated some qualitative evidence for improvements in job design (Van Wingerden, Derks, and Bakker 2017).…”

Section: Interventions Focused On Training Leaders To Improve Job Desmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Papers excluded (n=4) -1 study well-being assessed but not included as an outcome -3 studies focused on training but not job design 2014; Van Wingerden, Derks, and Bakker 2017;Yamagishi, Kobayashi, and Nakamura 2008). These interventions were considered to be related to changes in job design and other employment practices because training was used to improve job design.…”

Section: Papers Included In Systematic Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of the two studies that assessed job design, one indicated no effects on job design (Yamagishi, Kobayashi, and Nakamura 2008) and one indicated some qualitative evidence for improvements in job design (Van Wingerden, Derks, and Bakker 2017). All of the studies that demonstrated no effects on well-being had shortterm post-intervention assessments (less than or equal to three months).…”

Section: Interventions Focused On Training Leaders To Improve Job Desmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Job design, employment practices and well-being: a systematic review of intervention studies

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is inconsistent evidence that deliberate attempts to improve job design realise improvements in well-being. We investigated the role of other employment practices, either as instruments for job redesign or as instruments that augment job redesign. Our primary outcome was well-being. Where studies also assessed performance, we considered performance as an outcome. We reviewed 33 intervention studies. We found that well-being and performance may be improved by: training workers to improve their own jobs; training coupled with job redesign; and system wide approaches that simultaneously enhance job design and a range of other employment practices. We found insufficient evidence to make any firm conclusions concerning the effects of training managers in job redesign and that participatory approaches to improving job design have mixed effects. Successful implementation of interventions was associated with worker involvement and engagement with interventions, managerial commitment to interventions and integration of interventions with other organisational systems. Practitioner Summary: Improvements in well-being and performance may be associated with system-wide approaches that simultaneously enhance job design, introduce a range of other employment practices and focus on worker welfare. Training may have a role in initiating job redesign or augmenting the effects of job design on well-being.

show abstract

Section: Promisingmentioning

confidence: 93%

Section: Interventions Focused On Training Leaders To Improve Job Desmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Papers Included In Systematic Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Interventions Focused On Training Leaders To Improve Job Desmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Job design, employment practices and well-being: a systematic review of intervention studies

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although this requires significantly fewer resources than most individual CBT interventions, there might still be room for reducing this costly component even further. In the face of ample evidence that internet-based interventions (IBI) without guidance are less effective than guided interventions (24), and that unguided stress management interventions fail to show significant effects (25)(26)(27), it remains a challenging task to develop and disseminate iSMI that require only a minimum of guidance in order to produce a significant outcome.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Internet- and mobile-based stress management for employees with adherence-focused guidance: efficacy and mechanism of change

Ebert¹,

Lehr²,

Heber³

et al. 2016

Scand J Work Environ Health

109

104

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study adds to the literature by showing that (1) a newly developed internet-based stress-management intervention based on Lazarus' transactional stress model can be effective with only limited human support (<1 hour per participant), and (2) cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based interventions can have enduring effects on mental health and work-related health outcomes that go beyond immediate short-term effects.

show abstract

Preventing occupational stress in healthcare workers

Ruotsalainen

Verbeek

Albert

et al. 2014

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

162

166

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers can suffer from occupational stress which may lead to serious mental and physical health problems. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of work and person-directed interventions in preventing stress at work in healthcare workers. METHODS: COMMENTSOccupational stress has been shown to be an important social determinant of health through its negative impact among healthcare workers. 1 Adverse conditions within the context and content of work are risk factors for problems such as decreased work ability, 2 which may affect the quality and safety of healthcare services. Because of the socioeconomic impact of occupational stress, 3 studies on interventions for minimizing its effects are necessary.

show abstract

Effects of Web‐based Career Identity Training for Stress Management among Japanese Nurses: A Randomized Control Trial

Cited by 35 publications

References 5 publications

Job design, employment practices and well-being: a systematic review of intervention studies

Job design, employment practices and well-being: a systematic review of intervention studies

Internet- and mobile-based stress management for employees with adherence-focused guidance: efficacy and mechanism of change

Preventing occupational stress in healthcare workers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About