2015
DOI: 10.2298/bah1501073p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of weight and age on carcass yield and conformation of cattle

Abstract: The aim of this research was to analyse effects of weight and age of dairy cattle breeds and their crossbreeds (423 bulls, 492 heifers and 567 cows) on carcass yield and conformation scores according SEUROP standard data. All animals were divided into groups according to pre-slaughter weight (50 kg interval) and according to age (2 months interval). For research, average ages of the animals were: bulls 19 months, heifers 20 months and cows 38 months. The highest average weight was determined … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the correlations between carcass measures and carcass age were obvious and already well known [ 23 , 24 ], it was of our interest to determine the strength of any relationship between primary carcass fat and marbling measures. These results are in agreement with [ 25 ] and [ 6 ] studies, which raised questions about the ability of EUROP carcass measures to accurately predict marbling and fat composition of cuts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the correlations between carcass measures and carcass age were obvious and already well known [ 23 , 24 ], it was of our interest to determine the strength of any relationship between primary carcass fat and marbling measures. These results are in agreement with [ 25 ] and [ 6 ] studies, which raised questions about the ability of EUROP carcass measures to accurately predict marbling and fat composition of cuts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carcass conformation is the most important indicator when classifying carcasses because it directly indicates the amount of meat (Pečiulaitienė et al, 2015). It describes the development of carcass profiles, in particular the essential parts, such as legs (round and rump), back and shoulders (chuck), and indicates the sum of muscle and fat in relation to the bones (Ekiz et al, 2021).…”
Section: Carcass Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greater dressing percentage of the carcass based on carcass weight can improve the revenues of producers [10]. Carcass weight can be influenced by animal pre-slaughter weight because it has a strong correlation (r = 0.93, p <0.001) [11]. The positive correlation was also found in PO, SimxPO, and LimxPO cattle [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%