2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-13203-7_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Well Intake Systems on Removal of Algae, Bacteria, and Natural Organic Matter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also concluded that the length of the travel path from the sea to the production wells and the residence time of the infiltrated sea water in the aquifer may be the dominant factors controlling the rate of reduction. However, the removal of TEP does seem to occur at higher percentages in carbonate compared to siliciclastic aquifers (Rachman et al 2015), which confirms what was observed by Perry et al (2004).…”
Section: Aquifer Treatment and The Reduction Of Organic Carbon Duringsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They also concluded that the length of the travel path from the sea to the production wells and the residence time of the infiltrated sea water in the aquifer may be the dominant factors controlling the rate of reduction. However, the removal of TEP does seem to occur at higher percentages in carbonate compared to siliciclastic aquifers (Rachman et al 2015), which confirms what was observed by Perry et al (2004).…”
Section: Aquifer Treatment and The Reduction Of Organic Carbon Duringsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The invention of the LCOCD method and the vast improvements made in the accuracy of the measured fractions is relatively new and not commonly used in groundwater investigations in the past. The protocols and methods developed by Huber et al () were followed in order to measure different fractions of NOM using LCOCD and have been previously described in Rachman et al () and Dehwah and Missimer ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation