2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.01.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of wind intermittency on reduction of CO2 emissions: The case of the Spanish power system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 11 shows the different costs and ramping efficiencies of the power plants based on our rough estimations. We note that wind, solar, and nuclear production cannot be up-or down-reserved and that lignite and coal plants ramp-up relatively slowly, whereas gas-fired plants are characterized by flexibility (Gutiérrez-Martín et al, 2013).…”
Section: Appendix D Calibration and Detailed Results Of The German Pomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 11 shows the different costs and ramping efficiencies of the power plants based on our rough estimations. We note that wind, solar, and nuclear production cannot be up-or down-reserved and that lignite and coal plants ramp-up relatively slowly, whereas gas-fired plants are characterized by flexibility (Gutiérrez-Martín et al, 2013).…”
Section: Appendix D Calibration and Detailed Results Of The German Pomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Ueckerdt et al (2015) show that gas-fired plants are required when short-term variability of renewables is introduced into a long-term German power system model with an 80% emission reduction target. Indeed, gas-fired plants have lower CO 2 emissions and higher fuel efficiency than coal plants (Gutiérrez-Martín et al, 2013). However, major utilities in the UK, France, Germany, and Italy, among others, have recently closed or mothballed gas-fired power plants in response to low profitability (Caldecott and McDaniels, 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the cost side, only policy support costs have been taken into account and not system generation costs, which would be needed for a cost-benefit analysis. The costs for the electricity system related to the variable character and the limited predictability of the generation of electricity from intermittent RES-E (usually called cycling costs and balancing costs) have not been included because their values compared to other impacts are negligible with low RES-E penetration levels, as argue [5] and [14].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly with the results obtained from the analysis of the Spanish power system, CO 2 reductions are relevant even if the system shares a large amount of wind power [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%