2014
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of X-ray and extreme UV radiation on circumbinary planets

Abstract: Context. Several circumbinary planets have recently been discovered. The orbit of a planet around a binary stellar system poses several dynamic constraints. In addition to these constraints, the effects that radiation from the host stars may have on the planet atmospheres must be considered. We here evaluate these effects. Because of the configuration of a close binary system, these stars have a high rotation rate, even for old stars. The fast rotation of close, tidally locked binaries causes a permanent state… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed the two CB disks in our sample around P < 7 day binaries, V4046 Sgr and CoRoT 2239, have small mutual inclinations and do not host tertiaries capable of driving significant Lidov-Kozai oscillations (V4046 Sgr hosts a companion orbiting ∼12,000 au outside the disk; Kastner et al 2011). Two promising alternative explanations for the shortfall of CB planets around the shortest-period binaries are 1) a primordial phase of binary orbit expansion driven by pre-main-sequence tidal evolution which destabilizes planetary orbits (Fleming et al 2018) and 2) increased X-ray and EUV flux from tight, tidally locked binaries photoevaporates circumbinary planets to smaller planet radii (Sanz-Forcada et al 2014), which would remain undetected in the Kepler light curves.…”
Section: Circumbinary Planetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed the two CB disks in our sample around P < 7 day binaries, V4046 Sgr and CoRoT 2239, have small mutual inclinations and do not host tertiaries capable of driving significant Lidov-Kozai oscillations (V4046 Sgr hosts a companion orbiting ∼12,000 au outside the disk; Kastner et al 2011). Two promising alternative explanations for the shortfall of CB planets around the shortest-period binaries are 1) a primordial phase of binary orbit expansion driven by pre-main-sequence tidal evolution which destabilizes planetary orbits (Fleming et al 2018) and 2) increased X-ray and EUV flux from tight, tidally locked binaries photoevaporates circumbinary planets to smaller planet radii (Sanz-Forcada et al 2014), which would remain undetected in the Kepler light curves.…”
Section: Circumbinary Planetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This third star is suspected to either disrupt circumbinary planet formation (Muñoz & Lai 2015;Hamers et al 2016;Xu & Lai 2016) or bias the planet sample to long-period, misaligned orbits, both of which would have been missed by the Kepler transit survey. Alternate explanations for the dearth of planets around the tightest binaries, which do not invoke the presence of a third star, have also been proposed: tidal expansion of the binary orbit, causing the planet to become unstable (Fleming et al 2018) and UV evaporation of exoplanet atmospheres, shrinking them to an undetectable size (Sanz-Forcada et al 2014).…”
Section: Binary Orbital Periodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[89][90][91]. The X-IFU will allow us to investigate the initial phase of the intense flares including mass motions as well as their influence on circumstellar disks and/or early planetary evolution.…”
Section: Cool Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%