1985
DOI: 10.3109/00016488509104789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of X-ray Irradiation on Hearing in Guinea Pigs

Abstract: Effects of X-ray irradiation on the hearing with CM and ABR to both air- and bone-conduction stimuli were studied continuously from immediately after the irradiation to a few weeks later. At 2, 4, and 6 krad, only slight conductive hearing impairment was found, but at 8 krad or more, CM and ABR disappeared abruptly, after having increased briefly. Advanced sensorineural hearing loss appeared at about 10 hours after irradiation ended at 8 krad, at about 6 hours at 10 krad, and at about 3 hours at 12 krad. More … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
14
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For radiation-induced inner ear/ auditory nerve damage, metabolic, nutritional, and vascular susceptibility of the auditory apparatus are all possible causes. 4,6 The difference in the incidence and the magnitude of hearing deterioration between high and low frequencies is compatible with previous experience that the basal turn of the cochlea, tonotopically representing the high frequencies, is more vulnerable to injury. The reason for the susceptibility of the hearing ability at high frequencies to damage has not been explored in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For radiation-induced inner ear/ auditory nerve damage, metabolic, nutritional, and vascular susceptibility of the auditory apparatus are all possible causes. 4,6 The difference in the incidence and the magnitude of hearing deterioration between high and low frequencies is compatible with previous experience that the basal turn of the cochlea, tonotopically representing the high frequencies, is more vulnerable to injury. The reason for the susceptibility of the hearing ability at high frequencies to damage has not been explored in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…1 The associated inner ear damage as a result of irradiation to the head and neck region was recognized and then well-documented in animal and human studies. [2][3][4] Most of these studies, however, were retrospective and the follow-up periods were short. 5,6 Also, patients with a wide variety of head and neck cancer were usually included and they were managed with different treatment techniques.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This coincides well with the pathologic findings in animal experiments in which irradiation-induced damage is more pronounced in basal turn of the cochlea (Winther, 1969b;Tokimoto and Kanagawa, 1985). The increase in bone conduction thresholds (obtained in pure-tone audiometry) is assumed to reflect this cochlear dysfunction (Schot et al, 1992;Lau et al, 1992;Moretti, 1976).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…However, at ultra-high frequencies, the effect of RT in the present study was larger than that observed in our highdose cisplatin chemoradiation regimen, because the radiation effect in the CRT regimen might have been masked by the extensive adverse effect of cisplatin at ultra-high frequencies (26). Although radiation-induced vascular insufficiency has been proposed as the etiology of SNHL (27,28), in animal models, radiation and cisplatin both affected similar targets in the cochlea, including hair cells, stria vascularis, and afferent nerve endings, from basal to apical windings with increasing dose (27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33). Hence, it could be that cisplatin reinforces the adverse effects of radiation on the inner ear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%