2022
DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of β‐hydroxy β‐methylbutyrate (HMB) supplementation on muscle mass, function, and other outcomes in patients with cancer: a systematic review

Abstract: Low muscle mass is prevalent among patients with cancer and a predictor of adverse clinical outcomes. To counteract muscle loss, β-hydroxy β-methylbutyrate (HMB) supplementation has been proposed as a potential therapy for older adults and various diseases states. This systematic review aimed to investigate the effects and safety of HMB supplementation in relation to muscle mass and function and other clinical outcomes in patients with cancer. A systematic search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Central Re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
(494 reference statements)
1
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 231 studies were screened for eligibility, 92 were removed as duplicates, 104 articles were excluded based on title and abstract screening, and 20 were excluded upon full‐text assessment (see supporting information ). The 15 systematic reviews 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 that met our PICOS criteria ( Table 1 ) were included in our analysis (for details of studies, see supporting information ). AMSTAR scores for the included systematic reviews range from 1 to 9 ( Figure 2 , Table 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A total of 231 studies were screened for eligibility, 92 were removed as duplicates, 104 articles were excluded based on title and abstract screening, and 20 were excluded upon full‐text assessment (see supporting information ). The 15 systematic reviews 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 that met our PICOS criteria ( Table 1 ) were included in our analysis (for details of studies, see supporting information ). AMSTAR scores for the included systematic reviews range from 1 to 9 ( Figure 2 , Table 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These papers were retrieved and reviewed in greater detail yielding 14 systematic reviews ( Figure 1 ) pertinent to the research question 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 25 , 26 and according to the PICOS statement ( Table 1 ). One additional study was added, 24 totalling 15 studies. Two authors screened all reviews (K. J. L. and A. C. D.), and a third author checked their results (S. M. P.).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In patients with cancer, higher quality studies also support a beneficial effect of HMB supplementation on improving muscle mass and function, decreasing hospitalization, and improving survival in patients with cancer, in spite of the limited evidence [182].…”
Section: Branched-chain Amino Acids: Focus On Leucinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interest in anabolic players has recently shifted toward a derivative of leucine, β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB). HMB is now included in the formula of different oral nutritional supplements, and has been shown to favour muscle anabolism [29]. Cornejo-Pareja et al [30 ▪ ] tested a HMB-enriched oral nutritional supplement, also containing vitamin D, in 283 adult patients with or at risk of malnutrition under standard of care, 63% being cancer patients.…”
Section: The Quality Of Protein Intake As a Key Determinants Of Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%