2000
DOI: 10.1080/028134300448779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects on physicians' sick-listing practice of an administrative reform narrowing sick-listing benefits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[28][29][30] European studies have also reported musculoskeletal and mental health conditions as the most common reasons for certification. [31][32][33][34] It is possible that the rate of certification is higher in some conditions as a result of increased primary care attendance. For example, the rate of certification for mental health conditions, musculoskeletal conditions, injury, and respiratory conditions may be increased as they are all associated with frequent attendance in general practice.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28][29][30] European studies have also reported musculoskeletal and mental health conditions as the most common reasons for certification. [31][32][33][34] It is possible that the rate of certification is higher in some conditions as a result of increased primary care attendance. For example, the rate of certification for mental health conditions, musculoskeletal conditions, injury, and respiratory conditions may be increased as they are all associated with frequent attendance in general practice.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last decade, the sickness insurance systems in many Western countries have been subject to frequent changes [24,27] that have in many cases included restrictions in insurance legislation, which has in turn affected the ways that physicians have certified sickness absence [12,28,29]. Englund and co-workers [12] found that changes in rules for issuing sickness certificates did improve the more complete documentation, but that many certificates still lacked information on the type of employment (22%) and the prognosis for regaining previous functional capacity (27%); those finding agree with the present results. Bredkjaer-Rask and associates [25] observed that a majority of physicians using an extended sickness certificate frequently considered the prognosis of the medical disorder to be unclear, and that they did not know how the information on the certificates would be interpreted by the receivers.…”
Section: Implications For Policy-makersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on the practice of sick listing by physicians indicate no change in spite of an administrative reform intended to narrow sicklisting benefits [26]. The changes in our study may thus be a result of a diminishing demand for a sickness absence certificate owing to economic considerations among the pregnant women themselves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%