Effects on Strength, Power, and Flexibility in Adolescents of Nonperiodized Vs. Daily Nonlinear Periodized Weight Training

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare 2 models of resistance training (RT) programs, nonperiodized (NP) training and daily nonlinear periodized (DNLP) training, on strength, power, and flexibility in untrained adolescents. Thirty-eight untrained male adolescents were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: a control group, NP RT program, and DNLP program. The subjects were tested pretraining and after 4, 8, and 12 weeks for 1 repetition maximum (1RM) resistances in the bench press and 45° leg press, sit and reach test, countermovement vertical jump (CMVJ), and standing long jump (SLJ). Both training groups performed the same sequence of exercises 3 times a week for a total of 36 sessions. The NP RT consisted of 3 sets of 10-12RM throughout the training period. The DNLP training consisted of 3 sets using different training intensities for each of the 3 training sessions per week. The total volume of the training programs was not significantly different. Both the NP and DNLP groups exhibited a significant increase in the 1RM for the bench press and 45° leg press posttraining compared with that pretraining, but there were no significant differences between groups (p ≤ 0.05). The DNLP group's 1RM changes showed greater percentage improvements and effect sizes. Training intensity for the bench press and 45° leg press did not significantly change during the training. In the CMVJ and SLJ tests, NP and DNLP training showed no significant change. The DNLP group showed a significant increase in the sit and reach test after 8 and 12 weeks of training compared with pretraining; this did not occur with NP training. In summary, in untrained adolescents during a 12-week training period, a DNLP program can be used to elicit similar and possible superior maximal strength and flexibility gains compared with an NP multiset training model.

Effectiveness of Traditional Strength vs. Power Training on Muscle Strength, Power and Speed with Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

“… %Δ, Percent change from pre-test to post-test; BPT, balance training before plyometric training; BW, bodyweight; cm, centimeter; CMJ, counter movement jump; CSTS, core strength training on stable surface; CSTU, core strength training on unstable surface; EE, elbow extension; EF, elbow flexor; ET, elastic tubing; Ex, exercises; FFM, fat free mass; Freq, frequency; FW, free weight; Int, intensity; Isok, isokinetic; Isom, isometric; Isot, isotonic; KE, knee extension; KF, knee flexion; kg, kilogram; m, meter; Med, Medicine; Mod, moderate; MVIC, maximal voluntary isometric contraction; N, number of participants; PBT, plyometric training before balance training; PE, physical education students; PHV, peak height velocity; Post, post-test; Power, power measures; Pre, pre-test; PT, peak torque; Reps, repetitions; RM, repetition maximum; RPE, rating of perceived exertion; s, second; SD, standard deviation; Strength, strength measures; T, trained youth; TMS, trunk muscle strength; Tr, training status; U, untrained youth; Var, varied; Wks, weeks . Additional Citations for Table 2A are found in the text reference list (Hettinger, 1958; Funato et al, 1986; Sewall and Micheli, 1986; Weltman et al, 1986; Blimkie, 1989; Ozmun et al, 1994; DeRenne et al, 1996; Gorostiaga et al, 1999; Sadres et al, 2001; Flanagan et al, 2002; Pikosky et al, 2002; Tsolakis et al, 2004; Drinkwater et al, 2005; Benson et al, 2007; Faigenbaum et al, 2007a, 2014, 2015; Channell and Barfield, 2008; Rhea et al, 2008; Teng et al, 2008; Chelly et al, 2009; Dorgo et al, 2009; Lubans et al, 2010; Velez et al, 2010; Wong et al, 2010; Ebada, 2011; Granacher et al, 2011a,b, 2014, 2015; Ignjatovic et al, 2011; Muehlbauer et al, 2012; Santos and Janeira, 2012; Moore et al, 2013; Moraes et al, 2013; Sander et al, 2013; Coskun and Sahin, 2014; Ferrete et al, 2014; Pesta et al, 2014; Piazza et al, 2014; Dalamitros et al, 2015; Gonzalez-Badillo et al, 2015; dos Santos Cunha et al, 2015; Sarabia et al, 2015; Tran et al, 2015; Eather et al, 2016; Harries et al, 2016; Lloyd et al, 2016; Negra et al, 2016; Prieske et al, 2016; Rodriguez-Rosell et al, …”

Citius, Altius, Fortius: beneficial effects of resistance training for young athletes: Narrative review

“…Existing research indicates that various forms of resistance training can elicit performance improvements in muscular strength,8 power production,9 running velocity,10 tennis serve velocity,11 ball shooting speed,12 change of direction speed,13 aerobic endurance,12 dynamic balance,14 flexibility15 and general motor performance16 in children and adolescents. Leading professional organisations within the fields of paediatrics, sports medicine and exercise science advocate participation in youth resistance training programmes that are consistent with the individual needs and abilities of young athletes 4…”

Effect of 8-Week Circuit Weight Training on Strength

“…Circuit weight training during 8 weeks and the frequency of training four times a week. This is supported by Mylsidayu and Moraes that an increase in weight training occurs within 2-6 weeks with the DNLP linear periodization program with 20 reps and 50% of weight using bench press, leg press, front lat pull-down, leg extensions, military press, seated leg curls, pulley triceps extensions, abdominal crunches, and arm curls significantly increased bench press 15RM (175 and 219%), leg press 15RM (395 and 455%), maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max) (9 and 10%), and free fat mass (2.8 and 3%) [13,14]. Whereas Park said that a combination of aerobic exercise in the form of running with 40% -75% MHR and weight training with 60% -70% 1 RM [15], with 8-10 reps and 3 sets can significantly increase grip strength, push-ups, and intake maximum oxygen (VO2max) [16].…”