1972
DOI: 10.1002/oms.1210060508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effets Isotopiques dans la Fragmentation par Impact Électronique de Méthanols Deutériés

Abstract: The mass spectra of the CH,OH, CH,DOH, CD,OH, CH,OD and CD,OD methanols have been recorded at nominal electron energies ranging from 11 to 35 eV. Curves are given for the variation of the isotope effects related to the molecular ion stability and bond cleavage probabilities as a function of the electron energy, and are compared with apriori calculations. A simple distribution function and a value for the number of oscillators equal to half the theoretical figure give fairly satisfactory agreement, except as co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assist in the interpretation of our results, use has been made of the extensive range of experimental data available on the fragmentation of methanol ions. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] The variety of different excitation mechanisms extend from chemi-ionization using metastable helium atoms35 to multiphoton IR laser vaporization and ionization of solid methanol.39 Table I presents a compilation of some of the observed product ion intensities together with the intensities measured for Ar12-CH3OH+ and (C02)12-CH30H+, taken as being typical of the present experiments. A consideration of the results reveals a number of interesting points; first, the (C02)12'CH30H+ results are not too dissimilar from those observed for very low-energy charge-transfer or electron-impact processes, which suggests an internal energy for the molecular ion of 1-2 eV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To assist in the interpretation of our results, use has been made of the extensive range of experimental data available on the fragmentation of methanol ions. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] The variety of different excitation mechanisms extend from chemi-ionization using metastable helium atoms35 to multiphoton IR laser vaporization and ionization of solid methanol.39 Table I presents a compilation of some of the observed product ion intensities together with the intensities measured for Ar12-CH3OH+ and (C02)12-CH30H+, taken as being typical of the present experiments. A consideration of the results reveals a number of interesting points; first, the (C02)12'CH30H+ results are not too dissimilar from those observed for very low-energy charge-transfer or electron-impact processes, which suggests an internal energy for the molecular ion of 1-2 eV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sums and densities of energy states were evaluated by using the approximation due to Whitten and Rabinovitch.49 The vibrational frequencies of CH3OH+ and CD3OD+, and the critical energies for reactions 10 and 12, were taken from Corval and Masclett. 31 The possibility that reaction 11 has a reverse activation barrier means that an e0 value calculated from the available heat of formation data could be unreliable. Instead the critical energy has been taken from the appearance potential data on CHOH+;35 however, the presence of a kinetic shift50,51 could mean that its value has been slightly overestimated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, isotope labeling has often been employed to examine the mechanisms of fragmentation in the mass spectrometer, but the influence of isotopic substitution on the kinetics has not commanded nearly as many efforts. Early observations describe the influence of deuterium substitution on ion-source reactions by examining peak intensities in conventional mass spectra (McFadden & Wahrhaftig, 1956;Kropf et al, 1960;Natalis, 1964;McLeod & Djerassi, 1967;Corval & Masclet, 1972;Eadon & Zawalski, 1977;Mruzek & Bouchoux, 1980;Russell, 1993), but these reflect reactions of ions with a wide range of internal energies, and in turn a wide range of rate constants. The results are not easily interpreted in terms of specific isotope effects, as the influence of isotopic substitution on relative reaction rates may vary considerably when ions of quite different internal energy are concerned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%