2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09926-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy & safety of EUS-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (EDGE) in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass anatomy: a systematic review & meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a large multicenter study that included a total of 178 patients, technical success was achieved in 98% of the cases with severe adverse events requiring surgical intervention encountered in only 2.2% of cases [26]. A recent meta-analysis that comprised 16 studies and a total of 470 patients who underwent EDGE for the management of PB pathologies showed a pooled technical and clinical success rate of 96% and 91%, respectively [27 ▪ ]. In a multicenter study in which EDGE was compared to e-ERCP, the technical success was significantly higher in the EDGE group compared to the e-ERCP group (100% vs. 60%, P < 0.001), with a significantly shorter procedure time (49.8 min vs. 90.7 min, P < 0.001) [28].…”
Section: Pancreaticobiliary Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In a large multicenter study that included a total of 178 patients, technical success was achieved in 98% of the cases with severe adverse events requiring surgical intervention encountered in only 2.2% of cases [26]. A recent meta-analysis that comprised 16 studies and a total of 470 patients who underwent EDGE for the management of PB pathologies showed a pooled technical and clinical success rate of 96% and 91%, respectively [27 ▪ ]. In a multicenter study in which EDGE was compared to e-ERCP, the technical success was significantly higher in the EDGE group compared to the e-ERCP group (100% vs. 60%, P < 0.001), with a significantly shorter procedure time (49.8 min vs. 90.7 min, P < 0.001) [28].…”
Section: Pancreaticobiliary Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is usually recommended to remove the LAMS only when no additional biliopancreatic interventions are anticipated. Once the LAMS is removed a fistula may remain patent, leading potentially to weigh regain in patients with history of bariatric surgery [27 ▪ ,32]. It is currently debated whether the resulting fistula should be closed immediately following LAMS removal or be allowed to close spontaneously, as well as whether routine radiologic control should be performed in the weeks following LAMS removal to check for fistula persistence.…”
Section: Optimizing the Techniques: Evidence Behind Different Technic...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations