2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2004.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and compatibility with mass spectrometry of methods for elution of proteins from sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gels and polyvinyldifluoride membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in SDS-PAGE estimation of relative molecular mass (M r ) is based on comparison with reference proteins and accuracy of determined M r is relatively poor with 65-10% [10][11][12]. When proteins are electroeluted or electroblotted from slab gels and submitted either to electrospray ionizationmass spectrometry (ESI-MS) or matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI)-MS subsequently [12][13][14], mass accuracy improves to ,0.01-0.6% [15,16], but the methodology still suffers from critical selection of mass calibrants [15], interferences with buffer compounds, detergents [13,15], and staining compounds [10,15]. Sensitivity levels off at gel-loadings , 25 pmol due to extraction losses [15], which are probably related to the staining conditions that denature proteins [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in SDS-PAGE estimation of relative molecular mass (M r ) is based on comparison with reference proteins and accuracy of determined M r is relatively poor with 65-10% [10][11][12]. When proteins are electroeluted or electroblotted from slab gels and submitted either to electrospray ionizationmass spectrometry (ESI-MS) or matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI)-MS subsequently [12][13][14], mass accuracy improves to ,0.01-0.6% [15,16], but the methodology still suffers from critical selection of mass calibrants [15], interferences with buffer compounds, detergents [13,15], and staining compounds [10,15]. Sensitivity levels off at gel-loadings , 25 pmol due to extraction losses [15], which are probably related to the staining conditions that denature proteins [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This growth has resulted in mass spectrometry being used in tandem with a variety of other experimental techniques [3][4][5]. However, many of these techniques utilize reagents that can adversely affect the quality of mass spectra obtained by either suppressing analyte ionization or causing the formation of numerous adducts [6]. To avoid these effects, it is usually necessary to pretreat biological samples before analysis [7], a process which can lead to significant loss of analyte.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular markers that can potentially be used to identify small lesions that are invisible to imaging techniques could provide an opportunity to treat a neoplasm before it invades tissue. Markers that can detect ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) 6 would be particularly valuable because nearly 100% of women diagnosed at this early stage of breast cancer can be cured.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%