Efficacy and External Validity of Electronic and Mobile Phone-Based Interventions Promoting Vegetable Intake in Young Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

BackgroundYoung adults (18–35 years) remain among the lowest vegetable consumers in many western countries. The digital era offers opportunities to engage this age group in interventions in new and appealing ways.ObjectiveThis systematic review evaluated the efficacy and external validity of electronic (eHealth) and mobile phone (mHealth) -based interventions that promote vegetable intake in young adults.MethodsWe searched several electronic databases for studies published between 1990 and 2015, and 2 independent authors reviewed the quality and risk of bias of the eligible papers and extracted data for analyses. The primary outcome of interest was the change in vegetable intake postintervention. Where possible, we calculated effect sizes (Cohen d and 95% CIs) for comparison. A random effects model was applied to the data for meta-analysis. Reach and representativeness of participants, intervention implementation, and program maintenance were assessed to establish external validity. Published validation studies were consulted to determine the validity of tools used to measure intake. We applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to evaluate the overall quality of the body of evidence.ResultsOf the 14 studies that met the selection criteria, we included 12 in the meta-analysis. In the meta-analysis, 7 studies found positive effects postintervention for fruit and vegetable intake, Cohen d 0.14–0.56 (pooled effect size 0.22, 95% CI 0.11–0.33, I2=68.5%, P=.002), and 4 recorded positive effects on vegetable intake alone, Cohen d 0.11–0.40 (pooled effect size 0.15, 95% CI 0.04–0.28, I2=31.4%, P=.2). These findings should be interpreted with caution due to variability in intervention design and outcome measures. With the majority of outcomes documented as a change in combined fruit and vegetable intake, it was difficult to determine intervention effects on vegetable consumption specifically. Measurement of intake was most commonly by self-report, with 5 studies using nonvalidated tools. Longer-term follow-up was lacking from most studies (n=12). Risk of bias was high among the included studies, and the overall body of evidence was rated as low quality. The applicability of interventions to the broader young adult community was unclear due to poor description of external validity components.ConclusionsPreliminary evidence suggests that eHealth and mHealth strategies may be effective in improving vegetable intake in young adults; whether these small effects have clinical or nutritional significance remains questionable. With studies predominantly reporting outcomes as fruit and vegetable intake combined, we suggest that interventions report vegetables separately. Furthermore, to confidently establish the efficacy of these strategies, better-quality interventions are needed for young adults, using valid measures of intake, with improved reporting on costs, sustainability and long-term effects of programs.Trial registrationPROSPERO International Prospective Register of Syste...

Farmers' Market Utilization among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Recipients in New Orleans, Louisiana: Preliminary Findings

“…[40][41][42][43] A recent review article by Nour and colleagues found that many studies that used mobile phone technology to increase vegetable consumption were effective. 44 We are unaware of any other FM studies that employ internet-based promotion tactics for increasing FM use among SNAP participants. Currently, there is no consensus on the effectiveness of app-based interventions on influencing dietary behaviors.…”

T2DM Self-Management via Smartphone Applications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

“…Data recording of blood glucose and life-style changes has progressed from recording them in paper to uploading them to computers and using traditional phone functions, and finally to using smartphone apps. Many systematic reviews and meta-analyses proved that mHealth tools are effective in self-management in a wide range of areas both for disease-management and life-style changes in daily life [6–8]. Previous reviews of the mHealth tools have focused largely on text messaging, phone calls, or computer-based or laptop/tablet-based interventions rather than focusing on smartphone apps[9].…”

Characteristics of Smartphone Applications for Nutrition Improvement in Community Settings: A Scoping Review

“…In particular there is limited information regarding the best application characteristics for disadvantaged populations (5). There have been a number of early systematic reviews that examine the efficacy of health application interventions; however, these either focus on weight loss rather than nutrition improvement (10)(11)(12)(13)(14), exclude qualitative and descriptive studies (15,16), and/or include text messaging and Web-based interventions (10,12,13,(16)(17)(18), with none specifically relating to community settings.…”