2022
DOI: 10.3233/jad-210672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and Moderators of Virtual Reality for Cognitive Training in People with Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Background: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia result in cognitive decline which can negatively impact everyday functional abilities and quality of life. Virtual reality (VR) interventions could benefit the cognitive abilities of people with MCI and dementia, but evidence is inconclusive. Objective: To investigate the efficacy of VR training on global and domain-specific cognition, activities of daily living and quality of life. To explore the influence of priori moderators (e.g., immersion type, tra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
15
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
3
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there was no significant improvement in the subcategories such as global cognition (MD = −1.15, 95% CI: −2.83 to 0.53), executive function (MD = −2.56, 95% CI: −8.94 to 3.82), working memory (MD = 0.08, 95% CI: −0.93 to 1.10), memory function (MD = −0.26, 95% CI: −0.73 to 0.22), and attention (MD = −0.61, 95% CI: −1.26 to 0.05) when compared with the control group. Our results differed from those reported in previous meta-analyses [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ], which showed significant improvements in global cognition. A previous meta-analysis showed significant improvements in executive function [ 19 , 20 , 21 ] and memory function [ 15 , 19 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there was no significant improvement in the subcategories such as global cognition (MD = −1.15, 95% CI: −2.83 to 0.53), executive function (MD = −2.56, 95% CI: −8.94 to 3.82), working memory (MD = 0.08, 95% CI: −0.93 to 1.10), memory function (MD = −0.26, 95% CI: −0.73 to 0.22), and attention (MD = −0.61, 95% CI: −1.26 to 0.05) when compared with the control group. Our results differed from those reported in previous meta-analyses [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ], which showed significant improvements in global cognition. A previous meta-analysis showed significant improvements in executive function [ 19 , 20 , 21 ] and memory function [ 15 , 19 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of VR technology, many studies have been conducted on MCI, and numerous systematic reviews have been published [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. Systematic reviews have suggested that semi-immersive VR was more effective than immersive VR, and it showed significant improvement in global cognitive function and short-term memory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most previous studies used semi-immersive VR techniques (30), this study showed that fully immersive VR, which utilizes an environment that is closer to reality, also shows similarly high levels of satisfaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…It is well known that VR is safe and acceptable in people with mild cognitive impairment and dementia. However, in a review by Papaioannou et al, most studies utilized a non-immersive type (30). There is not much data on the fully-immersive type.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the occlusion of the external environment, immersive VR environments can be designed to closely replicate the cognitive demands of the real world, as such the tasks delivered in these environments are more ecologically valid than those delivered via non-immersive VR (Kober et al 2012 ). Therefore, the expectations are that immersive VR would lead to greater therapeutical improvements (Voinescu et al 2021b ; Papaioannou et al 2022 ). For this reason, immersive VR is considered a potential alternative intervention for children with ADHD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%