2023
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1113750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety of a 4-year combination therapy of growth hormone and gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue in pubertal girls with short predicted adult height

Abstract: ObjectivesTo improve adult height in pubertal girls with a poor height prediction, treatment with growth hormone (GH) can be used in combination with a gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa), to delay closure of the growth plates. However, there are few studies to support this practice, and they show conflicting results. The objective of this trial is to assess the safety and efficacy of this combination treatment in early pubertal girls with a short predicted height, in comparison with matched control… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A prospective, single-center, single-arm, open label study of the long-term use of Tri showed an increased risk of developing osteopenia after 12 months of treatment ( Alshehre et al, 2020 ). A 4-year interventional case–control study reported a case of metatarsal fracture ( Dotremont et al, 2023 ). Similarly, we also found the clinical priority for femoral neck fracture caused by Tri (aROR 10.75, 95% CI 6.23–18.54) was moderate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A prospective, single-center, single-arm, open label study of the long-term use of Tri showed an increased risk of developing osteopenia after 12 months of treatment ( Alshehre et al, 2020 ). A 4-year interventional case–control study reported a case of metatarsal fracture ( Dotremont et al, 2023 ). Similarly, we also found the clinical priority for femoral neck fracture caused by Tri (aROR 10.75, 95% CI 6.23–18.54) was moderate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%