2012
DOI: 10.1159/000341268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and Safety of a Novel ĸ-Agonist for Managing Intractable Pruritus in Dialysis Patients

Abstract: Background: Our previous placebo-controlled, prospective, double-blind study demonstrated that a new opioid ĸ-receptor agonist, nalfurafine hydrochloride, effectively reduced treatment-resistant pruritus in 337 hemodialysis patients. Thus, we designed this study to evaluate prospectively the efficacy, safety, addiction liability, and pharmacokinetics of nalfurafine given orally for 1 year. Methods: This open-label study examined the effects and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of 52-week oral administration of na… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
111
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
111
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…26 Nalfurafine was also demonstrated to be clinically effective in an open-label trial when administered at 5.0 μg/day for 1 year to 211 hemodialysis patients with intractable pruritus resistant to existing treatment. 27 The latter long-term study found no psychological or physical dependence on nalfurafine.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…26 Nalfurafine was also demonstrated to be clinically effective in an open-label trial when administered at 5.0 μg/day for 1 year to 211 hemodialysis patients with intractable pruritus resistant to existing treatment. 27 The latter long-term study found no psychological or physical dependence on nalfurafine.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…27,31 For each period, dependence during nalfurafine treatment was measured by 10 questions. Additionally, in case treatment was interrupted during each observation period, dependence during the 4 weeks after the end of treatment was assessed by six questions.…”
Section: Assessment Of Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…10) -àãîíèñò k 2 -è k 3 -îïèîèä-íûõ ðåöåïòîðîâ èìååò ôàðìàêîëîãè÷åñêèé ïðîôèëü, îòëè÷íûé îò òàêîâîãî êëàññè÷åñêèõ U50,488 è U69,593 [100,101]. Áûëè èçó÷åíû ïðîòèâîçóäíûå ýô-ôåêòû TRK-820 [102,103].…”
Section: -(1-áåíçîôóðàí-4-èë)-n-ìåòèë-n-[(5r7s8s)-7-ïèððîëèäèí-1-èunclassified
“… óñëîâèÿõ TRK-820-îïîñðåäîâàííîé ñóïðàñïèíàëüíîé àíàëüãåçèè îòíîøå-íèå ïîêàçàòåëåé ÝÄ 50 ñåäàöèè/ÝÄ 50 àíòèíîöèöåïöèè îêàçàëîñü ñóùåñòâåííî âûøå ïî ñðàâíåíèþ ñ òàêîâû-ìè äëÿ U-50,488 è ICI-199,441 [104]. Êðîìå òîãî, íàë-ôóðàôèí íå âûçûâàë ïñèõîòîìèìåòè÷åñêèõ ýôôåêòîâ ó çäîðîâûõ äîáðîâîëüöåâ [101,105], à òàêaeå ýôôåêòîâ ïîäêðåïëåíèÿ èëè àâåðñèâíûõ ðàññòðîéñòâ â äîçàõ äî 80 ìêã/êã [42]. Ñ 2009 ã. íàëôóðàôèí (òîðãîâîå íàçâà-íèå "Remitch") ðàçðåøåí ê ïðèìåíåíèþ íà òåððèòîðèè ßïîíèè â êà÷åñòâå ëåêàðñòâåííîãî ïðåïàðàòà äëÿ ëå÷å-íèÿ óðåìè÷åñêîãî çóäà ó áîëüíûõ, íàõîäÿùèõñÿ íà ãå-ìîäèàëèçå, ðåçèñòåíòíûõ ê ñòàíäàðòíîé òåðàïèè [101,103,106,107].…”
Section: -(1-áåíçîôóðàí-4-èë)-n-ìåòèë-n-[(5r7s8s)-7-ïèððîëèäèí-1-èunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation