2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.05.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety of an inactivated vaccine against Salmonid alphavirus (family Togaviridae)

Abstract: Pancreas disease (PD) in salmonid fish is caused by an infection with Salmonid alphavirus (SAV) and remains as one of the major health problems in the European fish farming industry. Sequence studies have revealed a genetic diversity among viral strains. A subtype of SAV (SAV3) is causing an epizootic in farmed salmonids in Norway. Here we evaluate efficacy and safety of an inactivated virus vaccine based on ALV405, a strain of SAV3 that was isolated from Norwegian salmon. The vaccine provided an average relat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The converse was described by Karlsen et al . () in PD vaccine trials using 1.15 × 10 8 TCID 50 /fish of SAV isolate ALV413. They obtained 87.5% cumulative mortality in intraperitoneal injected fish but negligible mortality in cohabitant fish, totally the opposite to our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The converse was described by Karlsen et al . () in PD vaccine trials using 1.15 × 10 8 TCID 50 /fish of SAV isolate ALV413. They obtained 87.5% cumulative mortality in intraperitoneal injected fish but negligible mortality in cohabitant fish, totally the opposite to our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IM route of infection for SAV-3 is not natural since it is expected that fish get infected either through vectors or the water itself. Challenge studies using the cohabitation model have previously been described although they have not performed according to expectations firstly because of the difficulty to induce mortalities experimentally for SAV in general [32,34,52] and secondly because the strength of virus challenge seems to be somewhat attenuated compared to IM challenge [53]. In the present study, the presence of virus at low titers in cohabitants (Figure  2b, 2 and 4 wpi) probably allowed the fish to mount a protective immune response resulting in the delay/down regulation of pathology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the endemic area, with movement restriction, the PD-affected sites have been allowed to keep their fish until slaughtering time. Vaccination has been practiced in the majority of the sites in this PD endemic area; however, the efficacy and effectiveness of the currently used vaccine is debatable [29]. Conversely, vaccination is not a common practice in the PD non-endemic area (the northern part of Norway), but a stamping out policy is regulated and followed by a fallowing period [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%