2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2013.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and Safety of Balugrastim Compared With Pegfilgrastim in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It appears that 3 mg/kg dose used in mice study is relatively high. This paper also reported that insertion of a G 4 SG 4 S linker could not improve the in vitro EC 50 . Another study reported the fusion of two tandem copies of exenatide to the N-terminus of albumin (E2HSA) [37].…”
Section: Glucagon-like Peptidementioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It appears that 3 mg/kg dose used in mice study is relatively high. This paper also reported that insertion of a G 4 SG 4 S linker could not improve the in vitro EC 50 . Another study reported the fusion of two tandem copies of exenatide to the N-terminus of albumin (E2HSA) [37].…”
Section: Glucagon-like Peptidementioning
confidence: 82%
“…It is produced in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae with high yield and purity. A phase III clinical trial in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy has been completed to compare the efficacy and safety between balugrastim and pegfilgrastim [50].…”
Section: Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the treatment-related AEs observed in this study were similar to those reported in the literature for myelosuppressive chemotherapy. [781114]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1014] A multicenter, retrospective, observational study using pegfilgrastim reported bone and muscle pain in only 1.7% of patients. [11] The latter is supported by our findings, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to PEG modifications, albumin fusion is easier to accomplish and provides a uniform substrate for G‐CSF without any additional chemical modifications. Additionally, albumin fusion may perform better by increasing the in vivo half‐life and reducing the side effects of the parent protein . Unfortunately, either albumin fusion or PEG modification may be accompanied by a decline in biological activity because of steric hindrance or closing the active site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%