2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2017.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety of biological DMARDs modulating B cells in primary Sjögren's syndrome: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
17
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We do not believe that there is, at present, any rationale for further trials of rituximab in PBC. As further data emerge regarding rituximab and its use in other inflammatory conditions such as primary Sjögren's syndrome, confidence in any beneficial effect on fatigue tends to decline …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not believe that there is, at present, any rationale for further trials of rituximab in PBC. As further data emerge regarding rituximab and its use in other inflammatory conditions such as primary Sjögren's syndrome, confidence in any beneficial effect on fatigue tends to decline …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In real life, the study by Fauchais et al 53 reported the use of hydroxychloroquine in more than half the patients presenting with joint involvement. With respect to the use of biological agents to treat these symptoms, the data from the two pivotal RCTs57 58 on the effect of rituximab on pain and fatigue reported no significant differences in comparison with placebo for both pain and fatigue VAS (although some differences were found at intermediate evaluation points in the French study), together with no significant placebo-differences in quality-adjusted life-year but with a fivefold greater economic cost,58 while a recent meta-analysis59 confirmed no significant differences after combining the results of these trials. In addition, a small RCT using anakinra found no significant reduction in fatigue in its primary endpoint,60 while the promising results obtained in two small open-label studies (<30 patients) using epratuzumab61 or abatacept62 must be confirmed in further large RCTs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Причины недостаточной эффективности РТМ в РКИ В метаанализ H. Letaief и соавт. [48] было включено 13 публикаций, из них 4 РКИ, включившие суммарно 302 пациента. Существенной разницы между основной и плацебо-группами не обнаружено по таким параметрам, как выраженность слабости и сухости по ВАШ, саливация и тест Ширмера.…”
Section: предикторы эффективности терапии ртмunclassified