2015
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety of biweekly i.v. administrations of the Aurora kinase inhibitor danusertib hydrochloride in independent cohorts of patients with advanced or metastatic breast, ovarian, colorectal, pancreatic, small-cell and non-small-cell lung cancer: a multi-tumour, multi-institutional phase II study

Abstract: 2006-003772-35.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alisertib monotherapy had only modest impact in vivo, but it remains possible that an optimized dosing regimen could improve this response. Recent clinical trials in relapsed SCLC tested Alisertib monotherapy with ~20% of patients exhibiting partial responses (Melichar et al, 2015) while a pan-Aurora kinase inhibitor had no responses in a small number of relapsed patients (Schoffski et al, 2015). Current clinical trials are assessing Alisertib in combination with chemotherapy as a second-line therapy (NCT02038647).…”
Section: Discusssionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alisertib monotherapy had only modest impact in vivo, but it remains possible that an optimized dosing regimen could improve this response. Recent clinical trials in relapsed SCLC tested Alisertib monotherapy with ~20% of patients exhibiting partial responses (Melichar et al, 2015) while a pan-Aurora kinase inhibitor had no responses in a small number of relapsed patients (Schoffski et al, 2015). Current clinical trials are assessing Alisertib in combination with chemotherapy as a second-line therapy (NCT02038647).…”
Section: Discusssionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to alisertib, which inhibits both AURKA and AURKB (see below), both AURKA-dominant (MK5108 and MLN-8054) and AURKB-specific (barasertib) compounds showed a strong association with RB1, implying that inhibition of either Aurora kinase should be sufficient to achieve a synthetic lethality. Because myelosuppression has been encountered in clinical studies with AURKB-specific and dual AURKA/B inhibitors (27)(28)(29), but not AURKA-dominant drugs MK5108 and MLN-8054 (30, 31), we reasoned that specific inhibition of AURKA might be better tolerated than AURKB, resulting in a better therapeutic window and permitting a higher dose intensity to more effectively treat RB1-deficient cancers.…”
Section: The Cytotoxicity Of Aurkai In Rb1-mutant Cells Is Dependent mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary evidence from a phase II study indicates that alisertib (MLN8237), an oral Aurora A kinase inhibitor, has a generally manageable safety profile and results in durable disease control in multiple cancer types [37]. The Aurora A kinase inhibitor danusertib has shown an acceptable safety profile and promising clinical activity in patients with advanced hematological malignancies [43], but limited activity in phase I/II studies in advanced solid tumors [44, 45]. The most widely tested Aurora B kinase inhibitor is barasertib (AZD1152), which has been evaluated in both patients with advanced solid tumors and those with hematological cancers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%